Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you don't just "challenge" a will because it's unfair.
You have to show either duress or incompetence. It's not like overturning a court case. People have the right to make unfair or even absurd wills -- leaving everything to a duck -- if they are competent to do so and no one forced them to.
+1. And the standard for competency is low and duress is high. Meaning, these are hard to win.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you don't just "challenge" a will because it's unfair.
You have to show either duress or incompetence. It's not like overturning a court case. People have the right to make unfair or even absurd wills -- leaving everything to a duck -- if they are competent to do so and no one forced them to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would contest it. My BIL was excluded from his dad's will. His dad left everything to his sister (BILs aunt). He contested it and won even though everyone knew his dad hated him.
That's different. That is a child contesting a will, not a grandchild.
Anonymous wrote:I would contest it. My BIL was excluded from his dad's will. His dad left everything to his sister (BILs aunt). He contested it and won even though everyone knew his dad hated him.