Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have two children (both boys) who are now in their early 30's.
S1 is great at EVERYTHING he has ever done. He did not take after either parent (both average with +/-'s). He was a great student, a great athlete, popular, caring, even tempered, and just about everything else that you could imagine. Since he was young, he has gotten out of bed at 5am and literally almost sprinted through the day with what seems like effortless grace until late into the evening 7 days a week. In high school and college he tutored kids in his class, raised money for numerous charities and travled on missions throughout the world.
S1 was admitted into the 4 Ivy league schools that he applied to but chose to go to Duke as it was a full ride scholarship (we paid nothing). He was admitted to Johns Hopkins on another full ride scholarship for medical school and is now a Cardiothoracic Surgeon at a top hospital. He possess a superhuman dedication, is incredibility intelligent and has the ability to work harder than any other person that I have ever seen on the planet.
S2 is 3 years younger and we an OK student. He was a normal kid with his ups and downs. Is a fine young man but like most has his warts.
I love them both but its really not a question of who the better person is. I never tried to compare the two while they were growing up and the OP should not as well. For those that say everyone has there strengths and weakness is full of it.
OP here. But how did you keep S2 from feeling bad about how well S1 did? Did you just tell S2 that you were impressed with A, B, C that S2 did? Did you tell him that everyone is different if he ever asked about S1 and his achievements?
Just wondering how to parent and make second child feel good about himself while first child is doing amazing at this, that, and the other. Also, do I congratulate first child just by himself when second child can't hear or just praise both in front of each other?
Anonymous wrote:I have two children (both boys) who are now in their early 30's.
S1 is great at EVERYTHING he has ever done. He did not take after either parent (both average with +/-'s). He was a great student, a great athlete, popular, caring, even tempered, and just about everything else that you could imagine. Since he was young, he has gotten out of bed at 5am and literally almost sprinted through the day with what seems like effortless grace until late into the evening 7 days a week. In high school and college he tutored kids in his class, raised money for numerous charities and travled on missions throughout the world.
S1 was admitted into the 4 Ivy league schools that he applied to but chose to go to Duke as it was a full ride scholarship (we paid nothing). He was admitted to Johns Hopkins on another full ride scholarship for medical school and is now a Cardiothoracic Surgeon at a top hospital. He possess a superhuman dedication, is incredibility intelligent and has the ability to work harder than any other person that I have ever seen on the planet.
S2 is 3 years younger and we an OK student. He was a normal kid with his ups and downs. Is a fine young man but like most has his warts.
I love them both but its really not a question of who the better person is. I never tried to compare the two while they were growing up and the OP should not as well. For those that say everyone has there strengths and weakness is full of it.
For those that say everyone has there strengths and weakness is full of it.
Anonymous wrote:I know many families in which the golden child who was great at school is now floundering, and the less flashy one who flew under the radar is the one with the good job and happy family.
Interestingly, in some cases, it's because the golden child prepared for a high flying career, and was then not quite good enough to get one of the rare excellent jobs in that field, while the late bloomer child found a field in which they truly excelled and focused on it. In some cases, the golden child is closer to the interfering parents, and has been held back by them, while the other child is free.
Anonymous wrote:I know many families in which the golden child who was great at school is now floundering, and the less flashy one who flew under the radar is the one with the good job and happy family.
Interestingly, in some cases, it's because the golden child prepared for a high flying career, and was then not quite good enough to get one of the rare excellent jobs in that field, while the late bloomer child found a field in which they truly excelled and focused on it. In some cases, the golden child is closer to the interfering parents, and has been held back by them, while the other child is free.
Anonymous wrote:My superstar sibling was murdered as a teenager. I'm the normal average one and even though he's been dead for 20 years it still stings that the golden child died and I lived. I know they wish it was the opposite