Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've moved our home search south of 50. We have 1 DC under 2. Trying to stay under 650k for a sfh. Are we going to have to look outside of Arlington? Do I really need to be concerned about Wakefield? That is a long time from now. Is the south going to turn around? Looked at a place near Columbia Pike and it's just ugly over there.
The obvious place to look if priced out of North Arlington is Falls Church, not South Arlington, if you care about schools.
I thought the falls church schools weren't great?
By just about any metric, George Mason, Marshall, McLean, and Falls Church fare better than Wakefield. Stuart and Wakefield are similar, though Wakefield has a new building.
Stuart is rated worse than Wakefield. I foresee
Wakefield trending upward- I don't see that at Stuart.
Most people around here use great schools- not a perfect scale, but it's what most are looking at. Stuart is the reason for the charter discussion over there. Not good. I haven't heard anything bad about Wakefield. Actually I've only heard good things, and the kids I've met are good kids.
Rated worse? Depends on who is doing the rating and what's being rated. Wakefield has higher SOL scores, but Stuart's 2014 SAT scores were higher than Wakefield's (1464 vs. 1417). But, in either case, the other FC-areas schools are currently rated higher than both Wakefield and Stuart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've moved our home search south of 50. We have 1 DC under 2. Trying to stay under 650k for a sfh. Are we going to have to look outside of Arlington? Do I really need to be concerned about Wakefield? That is a long time from now. Is the south going to turn around? Looked at a place near Columbia Pike and it's just ugly over there.
The obvious place to look if priced out of North Arlington is Falls Church, not South Arlington, if you care about schools.
I thought the falls church schools weren't great?
By just about any metric, George Mason, Marshall, McLean, and Falls Church fare better than Wakefield. Stuart and Wakefield are similar, though Wakefield has a new building.
Stuart is rated worse than Wakefield. I foresee
Wakefield trending upward- I don't see that at Stuart.
Anonymous wrote:Consider Falls Church part of Fairfax County, generally near or north of I66. Better schools for your $$ than S. Arlington. Elementary schools Shrevewood, Lemon Road, Westgate, Timber Lane. McLean/Marshall pyramids. Still pretty close in to DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've moved our home search south of 50. We have 1 DC under 2. Trying to stay under 650k for a sfh. Are we going to have to look outside of Arlington? Do I really need to be concerned about Wakefield? That is a long time from now. Is the south going to turn around? Looked at a place near Columbia Pike and it's just ugly over there.
The obvious place to look if priced out of North Arlington is Falls Church, not South Arlington, if you care about schools.
I thought the falls church schools weren't great?
By just about any metric, George Mason, Marshall, McLean, and Falls Church fare better than Wakefield. Stuart and Wakefield are similar, though Wakefield has a new building.
Anonymous wrote:Consider Falls Church part of Fairfax County, generally near or north of I66. Better schools for your $$ than S. Arlington. Elementary schools Shrevewood, Lemon Road, Westgate, Timber Lane. McLean/Marshall pyramids. Still pretty close in to DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be very wary OP. Yes the SFH neighborhoods are nice, but the County is actively working to maintain the status quo on the Pike. The Trolley might have brought some gentrification, but that's cancelled. All of the candidates for the open Board seats are on record for mainting and if possible expanding affordable housing. There is only one place that it is going - south Arlington. Maybe the demographics will change, but not if the county can help it.
+1000
The demographics are already changing. Some affordable housing isn't going to completely counteract all the SFHs available. Plus we are getting a starbucks, that is like the ultimate sign of gentrification![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be very wary OP. Yes the SFH neighborhoods are nice, but the County is actively working to maintain the status quo on the Pike. The Trolley might have brought some gentrification, but that's cancelled. All of the candidates for the open Board seats are on record for mainting and if possible expanding affordable housing. There is only one place that it is going - south Arlington. Maybe the demographics will change, but not if the county can help it.
+1000