Anonymous
Post 04/15/2015 07:50     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
She's a very accomplished and hardworking, dedicated, intelligent person. She has a lot of great qualities, and I think she would be a very competent President.

But she won't be elected, because she's simply not a good candidate. She never has been. She's aloof and shrill and grating and not very personable. Very few of us would do any better, to be sure, because very few people are natural political candidates. But that's what it takes to be President, and she is completely lacking in that regard. The Democrats are throwing this one.
Anonymous
Post 04/15/2015 07:45     Subject: Re:Don't call her "Hillary"
No matter what, she seems to lack the necessary charisma.
Anonymous
Post 04/15/2015 07:34     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
You know when it bugs me? When news outlets or newspapers that consistently refer to people as "Mr." Obama or "President" Obama or "Secretary Kerry" turn around and call her Hillary. The inconsistency there bugs me. And Fox News does it all the time.

But what she does with it is fine.
Anonymous
Post 04/15/2015 06:44     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It kind of bugged me at first, but it does seem that the campaign in embracing it. No one took issue with calling Bush "W", that I can remember. I'm tired of hearing about her, too. No one ever says anything interesting.


+1. I'd agree with not calling her anything at call. She failed in 2008, time for new faces.


Don't agree. She came close in 2008 and was clocked by a young phenom. I was very impressed with how she conducted herself at the end of that campaign and how much support she gave to Obama. The lady is a team player who worked for the good of the party. She used her "off" time to work as Secretary of State and gain valuable foreign policy experience. She is a known quantity to our allies and enemies. She's a terrific candidate in 2016.

I was very skeptical of her in 2008 and I love her now.


+1000. She's a class act. I supported Obama in 08, but I'll be proud to vote for Hill this time around. In 08 I felt like we had two good choices, and how often does that happen? It was really nice in the primary to vote for the greater of two goods and not the lesser of two evils.
Anonymous
Post 04/15/2015 06:19     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is going to be difficult when she spearheaded her campaign with "IM READY FOR HILLARY" everywhere


She actually had nothing to do with that. It's a super PAC started by two complete non-insiders.

But I think she prefers Hillary, hence the campaign's name.


It was all over the place the day she announced. How does she have nothing to do with that? Clearly her team is involved.


Sorry -- I'm dense, not enough coffee -- you do mean the Ready for Hillary super PAC, right? They knew she was announcing Sunday, but so did everyone in the entire world. A really young guy and a woman who I think is a professor at Georgetown, maybe, started Ready for Hillary a couple of years ago to collect endorsements and urge Hillary to run. People like Tim Kaine and Clare McCaskill were emailing their own supporters during that time, saying they were "Ready for Hillary." It's not affiliated with the campaign, but they will pass along their email list to the campaign now that it's official.

Yes, it was definitely all over the place the day she announced.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 22:43     Subject: Re:Don't call her "Hillary"
Her logo is an " H" not a "C"
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 22:38     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is going to be difficult when she spearheaded her campaign with "IM READY FOR HILLARY" everywhere


She actually had nothing to do with that. It's a super PAC started by two complete non-insiders.

But I think she prefers Hillary, hence the campaign's name.


It was all over the place the day she announced. How does she have nothing to do with that? Clearly her team is involved.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 18:56     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:This is going to be difficult when she spearheaded her campaign with "IM READY FOR HILLARY" everywhere


She actually had nothing to do with that. It's a super PAC started by two complete non-insiders.

But I think she prefers Hillary, hence the campaign's name.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 18:13     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:I can see already that the cult worship for Obama is being transferred to Hillary. It's embarrassing when Americans do this. North Koreans, fine. But not us.


Americans wasted their time kicking England out if we are going to start electing the family members of previous presidents to the office of president. And that goes for Jeb as well. No more family dynasties. I see people getting ready for Chelsea, and saying Mrs Obama should run for Senate, and then president.

For the love of dog! Marrying a politician does not confer political acumen upon you! It gives you a leg up with political machinations and money gatherers.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 17:57     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
I can see already that the cult worship for Obama is being transferred to Hillary. It's embarrassing when Americans do this. North Koreans, fine. But not us.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 17:04     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
bimboslayer?
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 16:46     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It kind of bugged me at first, but it does seem that the campaign in embracing it. No one took issue with calling Bush "W", that I can remember. I'm tired of hearing about her, too. No one ever says anything interesting.


+1. I'd agree with not calling her anything at call. She failed in 2008, time for new faces.


Don't agree. She came close in 2008 and was clocked by a young phenom. I was very impressed with how she conducted herself at the end of that campaign and how much support she gave to Obama. The lady is a team player who worked for the good of the party. She used her "off" time to work as Secretary of State and gain valuable foreign policy experience. She is a known quantity to our allies and enemies. She's a terrific candidate in 2016.

I was very skeptical of her in 2008 and I love her now.


That's your way to see it. IMO, she proved to be a disaster running a campaign that was hers to win, in the same way she made a whole mess of healthcare reform in the 90s.

I'd rather see some fresh AND accomplished faces...to me, she's neither.


Well, she's going to be the Democratic nominee, so line up your fresh and accomplished Republican faces and let's see how things go!


Indeed, I'm open to the idea of voting Republican for the first time...but of course that depends on who gets their nomination
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 16:45     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It kind of bugged me at first, but it does seem that the campaign in embracing it. No one took issue with calling Bush "W", that I can remember. I'm tired of hearing about her, too. No one ever says anything interesting.


+1. I'd agree with not calling her anything at call. She failed in 2008, time for new faces.


Don't agree. She came close in 2008 and was clocked by a young phenom. I was very impressed with how she conducted herself at the end of that campaign and how much support she gave to Obama. The lady is a team player who worked for the good of the party. She used her "off" time to work as Secretary of State and gain valuable foreign policy experience. She is a known quantity to our allies and enemies. She's a terrific candidate in 2016.

I was very skeptical of her in 2008 and I love her now.


That's your way to see it. IMO, she proved to be a disaster running a campaign that was hers to win, in the same way she made a whole mess of healthcare reform in the 90s.

I'd rather see some fresh AND accomplished faces...to me, she's neither.


Indeed, I'm open to the idea of voting Republican for the first time...but of course that depends on who gets their nomination

Well, she's going to be the Democratic nominee, so line up your fresh and accomplished Republican faces and let's see how things go!
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 16:33     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
This is going to be difficult when she spearheaded her campaign with "IM READY FOR HILLARY" everywhere
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2015 16:18     Subject: Don't call her "Hillary"
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It kind of bugged me at first, but it does seem that the campaign in embracing it. No one took issue with calling Bush "W", that I can remember. I'm tired of hearing about her, too. No one ever says anything interesting.


+1. I'd agree with not calling her anything at call. She failed in 2008, time for new faces.


Don't agree. She came close in 2008 and was clocked by a young phenom. I was very impressed with how she conducted herself at the end of that campaign and how much support she gave to Obama. The lady is a team player who worked for the good of the party. She used her "off" time to work as Secretary of State and gain valuable foreign policy experience. She is a known quantity to our allies and enemies. She's a terrific candidate in 2016.

I was very skeptical of her in 2008 and I love her now.


That's your way to see it. IMO, she proved to be a disaster running a campaign that was hers to win, in the same way she made a whole mess of healthcare reform in the 90s.

I'd rather see some fresh AND accomplished faces...to me, she's neither.


Well, she's going to be the Democratic nominee, so line up your fresh and accomplished Republican faces and let's see how things go!