Anonymous wrote:After everything they went through the first time around you would think they would be a little more cautious. Those poor kids. The parents must really be clueless. Regardless of how you feel about letting the kids go to the park alone, you've got to admit that they screwed up this time. Their prior involvement with CPS obviously didn't phase them. I suspect this time it might.
Question: why don't they just take their kids to the park? It was gorgeous outsude this weekend. What on earth are the parents so busy with at home? I suspect they simply aren't involved parents. They're probably at home reading.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever.
+1 Everyone was doing what they thought was right.
I have no interest into getting into another long thread about this again. OP just wants to find fault. Boring.
I'm not the OP, and I want to find fault. You know all those worries about kids being abducted by strangers? For these kids, that worry became reality yesterday, thanks to a busybody neighbor.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/28783266/free-range-kids
What? They weren't abducted. These parents care more about publicity and ideology than their kids.
They weren't abducted? Your definition of abduction must be different from mine.
Anonymous wrote:Time to jail the parents
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whether or not I agree that these kids should be able to do this type of thing, I can't imagine doing it after the first instance of CPS involvement. Seems kind of stupid and asking for trouble.
Well, you can focus on the parents, or you can focus on the police and CPS -- you know, the law. I think the actions of the police and CPS are the issue here.
Maybe. But I wouldn't risk putting my kids through another incident with CPS over my desire to have them be "free-range." No way.
I wouldn't either. But is that the issue? That's like finding out about the shooting in South Carolina and saying, "Whether or not I agree that the police shouldn't shoot people in the back when they are running away from the police, I can't imagine running from the police during a traffic stop."
Well, no. The issue here is the judgment of the parents, which seems to be somewhat lacking. But thanks for trying to make this so inflammatory and about race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whether or not I agree that these kids should be able to do this type of thing, I can't imagine doing it after the first instance of CPS involvement. Seems kind of stupid and asking for trouble.
Well, you can focus on the parents, or you can focus on the police and CPS -- you know, the law. I think the actions of the police and CPS are the issue here.
Maybe. But I wouldn't risk putting my kids through another incident with CPS over my desire to have them be "free-range." No way.
I wouldn't either. But is that the issue? That's like finding out about the shooting in South Carolina and saying, "Whether or not I agree that the police shouldn't shoot people in the back when they are running away from the police, I can't imagine running from the police during a traffic stop."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever.
+1 Everyone was doing what they thought was right.
I have no interest into getting into another long thread about this again. OP just wants to find fault. Boring.
I'm not the OP, and I want to find fault. You know all those worries about kids being abducted by strangers? For these kids, that worry became reality yesterday, thanks to a busybody neighbor.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/28783266/free-range-kids
Seriously? A link to Fox News? LOL
Go grind your ax someplace else. I doubt you even have young children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whether or not I agree that these kids should be able to do this type of thing, I can't imagine doing it after the first instance of CPS involvement. Seems kind of stupid and asking for trouble.
Well, you can focus on the parents, or you can focus on the police and CPS -- you know, the law. I think the actions of the police and CPS are the issue here.
Maybe. But I wouldn't risk putting my kids through another incident with CPS over my desire to have them be "free-range." No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever.
+1 Everyone was doing what they thought was right.
I have no interest into getting into another long thread about this again. OP just wants to find fault. Boring.
I'm not the OP, and I want to find fault. You know all those worries about kids being abducted by strangers? For these kids, that worry became reality yesterday, thanks to a busybody neighbor.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/28783266/free-range-kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever.
+1 Everyone was doing what they thought was right.
I have no interest into getting into another long thread about this again. OP just wants to find fault. Boring.
I'm not the OP, and I want to find fault. You know all those worries about kids being abducted by strangers? For these kids, that worry became reality yesterday, thanks to a busybody neighbor.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/28783266/free-range-kids
What? They weren't abducted. These parents care more about publicity and ideology than their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whether or not I agree that these kids should be able to do this type of thing, I can't imagine doing it after the first instance of CPS involvement. Seems kind of stupid and asking for trouble.
Well, you can focus on the parents, or you can focus on the police and CPS -- you know, the law. I think the actions of the police and CPS are the issue here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever.
+1 Everyone was doing what they thought was right.
I have no interest into getting into another long thread about this again. OP just wants to find fault. Boring.
I'm not the OP, and I want to find fault. You know all those worries about kids being abducted by strangers? For these kids, that worry became reality yesterday, thanks to a busybody neighbor.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/28783266/free-range-kids