Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds fishy. There has to be another side to the story. For example, perhaps he was extremely controlling about money before the wife started working?
Something similar happened to my in-laws. My FIL was super controlling about money and treated it like it was HIS. Then my MIL inherited a vast estate and all of a sudden my FIL wanted joint accounts and to share. My MIL refused and demanded to keep things the way they were for years.
Agree it sounds fishy.
It certainly is fishy. It is always the man's fault. Always. if you are born with a penis and if a woman near you acts insane, you are to blame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds fishy. There has to be another side to the story. For example, perhaps he was extremely controlling about money before the wife started working?
Something similar happened to my in-laws. My FIL was super controlling about money and treated it like it was HIS. Then my MIL inherited a vast estate and all of a sudden my FIL wanted joint accounts and to share. My MIL refused and demanded to keep things the way they were for years.
Agree it sounds fishy.
Anonymous wrote:If you are the same person who keeps coming here to talk about all the stuff his wife won't do and the problems she causes for the teenage daughter, will you please divorce her already? I don't know what you think is going to change.
Anonymous wrote:There are many things, but this is the last straw. She feels entitled to "compensation" for all her years working as a SAHM. That is her complaint about my asking to now shar accounts and expenses.
She is thinking only about herself and not the family unit.
I am just sad it comes to this and that in the end it is true that the only person she cares about is herself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You said "my DD." Is she not your wife's daughter as well?
I don't understand why people harp on this use of possessive pronouns. That kid is way more his than she is yours. And he's the one writing, not both he and his wife. You are reading way too much into this.
I don't think this was about harping on pronouns as much as recognizing that blended families exist and wondering if that was the case here.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds fishy. There has to be another side to the story. For example, perhaps he was extremely controlling about money before the wife started working?
Something similar happened to my in-laws. My FIL was super controlling about money and treated it like it was HIS. Then my MIL inherited a vast estate and all of a sudden my FIL wanted joint accounts and to share. My MIL refused and demanded to keep things the way they were for years.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds fishy. There has to be another side to the story. For example, perhaps he was extremely controlling about money before the wife started working?
Something similar happened to my in-laws. My FIL was super controlling about money and treated it like it was HIS. Then my MIL inherited a vast estate and all of a sudden my FIL wanted joint accounts and to share. My MIL refused and demanded to keep things the way they were for years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You said "my DD." Is she not your wife's daughter as well?
I don't understand why people harp on this use of possessive pronouns. That kid is way more his than she is yours. And he's the one writing, not both he and his wife. You are reading way too much into this.