Anonymous wrote:The only reason I'd put this stipulation on a kid is the flight costs. Even then, I think I'd be more inclined to say, "Look, if you want to come home at every break, you earn the money yourself." I hate the thought of saying that, but reality is, college is so expensive already that a few $1000 round-trip flights a year could be totally cost prohibitive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's wrong. College is a time to go off and explore, and if a kid needs to do that by going across the country so be it. You can drive for five hours or fly for five hours.
You don't "need" to fly 5 hours to explore. Unless a kid wants some kind of very specific education (e.g. a specific service academy), you can find pretty much every kind of option within driving distance of DC. If you live in Alaska, it might be different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's wrong. College is a time to go off and explore, and if a kid needs to do that by going across the country so be it. You can drive for five hours or fly for five hours.
You don't "need" to fly 5 hours to explore. Unless a kid wants some kind of very specific education (e.g. a specific service academy), you can find pretty much every kind of option within driving distance of DC. If you live in Alaska, it might be different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's wrong. College is a time to go off and explore, and if a kid needs to do that by going across the country so be it. You can drive for five hours or fly for five hours.
You don't "need" to fly 5 hours to explore. Unless a kid wants some kind of very specific education (e.g. a specific service academy), you can find pretty much every kind of option within driving distance of DC. If you live in Alaska, it might be different.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's wrong. College is a time to go off and explore, and if a kid needs to do that by going across the country so be it. You can drive for five hours or fly for five hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a friend that required her DD to only look at schools that were within a 5-6hr drive from DMV. She wants to be able to reach her at a moments notice if the DD needs her. She did make an exception for some ATL schools (she has friends down there). Just wondering what other people think of this. My DD will start looking at colleges next year and while she has not spoken about midwest or west coast schools, I really do not want her to be that far away. Is that selfish?
I totally agree with the folks that are saying its reasonable to put this restriction on college choices for monetary reasons--flight costs can really add up.
I could also possibly see a situation where a kid with some kind of physical or intellectual disability might need to be closer to home.
However, the situation OP is describing sounds like none of those situations. Mom wants to "reach her at a moments notice if she needs her."
That's helicopter parenting, and mom needs to detach. If I were the DD, I would intentionally be looking for the absolute maximum distance I could from this mom.
Anonymous wrote:We don't know anything about the daughter, and OP may not really know either.
Could be reasonable given circumstances we don't know about
Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised by how many people think this is reasonable. Yes, if you're paying, it is your right to condition your money on virtually anything you want to. But your kid might be a fit somewhere farther away. Or, might just plain old WANT to be farther away from you for a few years. I think that part of accepting that they are becoming adults is letting them have the freedom to choose some place farther afield. (And, while there are plenty of decent schools near here, you're still eliminating literally dozens of excellent options based on an arbitrary distance rule).
Also, I can't help but suspect that concerns like flight costs (trivial compared to the cost of college) and emergency issues (if your kid winds up in, say, Boston, they'll be near an airport if they need to come home and near stellar hospitals if an accident happens) are a bit insincere and tend more to mask our own sadness and insecurity with the fact that our kids are leaving home. Yeah, its your money, but its not a strong enough reason to override your kids wishes, in my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Times have changed. My parents told me I needed to go at least two hours away to learn to be on my own.