Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister majored in stem at a top school and is getting laid off tomorrow from a company who pays excellent and whose products you use daily.
She's a top performer and has been there less than three years.
STEM isn't a security blanket. Along with her another 100 devs are getting canned (she's not a dev).
This is just the tip of a massive hit that'll come down in sept.
No she's not at IBM.
STEM is a guarantee of nothing.
Just like the genetics field, STEM jobs are slowly being moved to India.
Anonymous wrote:My sister majored in stem at a top school and is getting laid off tomorrow from a company who pays excellent and whose products you use daily.
She's a top performer and has been there less than three years.
STEM isn't a security blanket. Along with her another 100 devs are getting canned (she's not a dev).
This is just the tip of a massive hit that'll come down in sept.
No she's not at IBM.
STEM is a guarantee of nothing.
Anonymous wrote:My sister majored in stem at a top school and is getting laid off tomorrow from a company who pays excellent and whose products you use daily.
She's a top performer and has been there less than three years.
STEM isn't a security blanket. Along with her another 100 devs are getting canned (she's not a dev).
This is just the tip of a massive hit that'll come down in sept.
No she's not at IBM.
STEM is a guarantee of nothing.
Anonymous wrote:For the average kid, engineering is a great major because it is a high level vocational education choice, just like pharmacy or nursing. Most engineers are just smart mechanics. They build machines/processes and tinker and learn how to do it in a disciplined way. You need lots of engineers in a modern world, so most work on pretty routine stuff that doesn't require huge brainpower. That's why engineers from third rate colleges can still get jobs.
On the other hand, you need a first rate mind to be a good philosopher or historian or anthropologist. That's why it is generally a much better idea to study one of those fields at a top tier highly selective school, rather than a 2nd tier program. The sociology major from Southwest Arkansas State may well be pulling espresso for a living, but the Yale lit major won't.
Anonymous wrote:^^ You are all missing the point. This is not about English majors are better than Engineers, nah, nah, nah, nah-nah. The world needs both. The point is there is no reason to push for a person without the interest or aptitude for STEM -- or for English, for that matter -- to major in something because you think it will get you a job or you'll make more money.
Those decisions typically precede really interesting mid-life crises.
Anonymous wrote:For the average kid, engineering is a great major because it is a high level vocational education choice, just like pharmacy or nursing. Most engineers are just smart mechanics. They build machines/processes and tinker and learn how to do it in a disciplined way. You need lots of engineers in a modern world, so most work on pretty routine stuff that doesn't require huge brainpower. That's why engineers from third rate colleges can still get jobs.
On the other hand, you need a first rate mind to be a good philosopher or historian or anthropologist. That's why it is generally a much better idea to study one of those fields at a top tier highly selective school, rather than a 2nd tier program. The sociology major from Southwest Arkansas State may well be pulling espresso for a living, but the Yale lit major won't.
Anonymous wrote:Fareed Zakaria is not someone who has a lot of credibility given his record of plagiarism.
The reality is that as the economy changes the skill-set to be marketable will also change. Not to recognize this is to risk going the way of a dinosaur. Since we are paying for our children's college, we have made it clear to them that although we will not decide their major, we reserve the right to veto a major that we believe will not increase their potential for being gainfully employed after they finish college. We sure as hell are not going to spend $200K on getting them an education in some major that will not enhance their prospects for employment down the line.
Citing the examples of Zuckerberg, Gates and others is akin to arguing that one does not need a college education because these two individuals did just fine though they dropped out of college.
Anonymous wrote:For the average kid, engineering is a great major because it is a high level vocational education choice, just like pharmacy or nursing. Most engineers are just smart mechanics. They build machines/processes and tinker and learn how to do it in a disciplined way. You need lots of engineers in a modern world, so most work on pretty routine stuff that doesn't require huge brainpower. That's why engineers from third rate colleges can still get jobs.
On the other hand, you need a first rate mind to be a good philosopher or historian or anthropologist. That's why it is generally a much better idea to study one of those fields at a top tier highly selective school, rather than a 2nd tier program. The sociology major from Southwest Arkansas State may well be pulling espresso for a living, but the Yale lit major won't.