Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents with boys born in the spring and early summer will secretly hate you and talk about you behind your back. It's true.
?? I don't understand this.
It's annoying if people hold their August kids back, making everyone in the class much older than the spring kids. that should not be surprising.
I can't defend people talking behind backs, but I get that it would be annoying, for sure.
Anonymous wrote:Previous poster again--
I'm one of the ones that held back a Sept birthday at Janney. My child came into K reading fluently. But it was no big deal and he/she wasn't bored--I'd estimate that 80% of his/her classmates were also reading fluently upon entering K. My child wasn't bored---he/she was the norm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents with boys born in the spring and early summer will secretly hate you and talk about you behind your back. It's true.
?? I don't understand this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Previous poster again--
I'm one of the ones that held back a Sept birthday at Janney. My child came into K reading fluently. But it was no big deal and he/she wasn't bored--I'd estimate that 80% of his/her classmates were also reading fluently upon entering K.
My child wasn't bored---he/she was the norm.
OP here-- this is what I'm afraid of...that most kids born in Aug/Sept are held back so then my child will be "behind" and, with a large class, unable to keep up or get the personal attention he needs to learn how to read. Again, I'm not interested in holding him back so he can be "advanced" or can any advantage athletically or whatever. Physically, he's already on the tall side for even a 4 year old.
But if he's going to be out of the norm for his K class, then I'd want to know. If I call the school, can I just make an appointment to talk to the principal (sorry, I am new to this; this is my oldest child)?
Anonymous wrote:Previous poster again--
I'm one of the ones that held back a Sept birthday at Janney. My child came into K reading fluently. But it was no big deal and he/she wasn't bored--I'd estimate that 80% of his/her classmates were also reading fluently upon entering K.
My child wasn't bored---he/she was the norm.
Anonymous wrote:The parents with boys born in the spring and early summer will secretly hate you and talk about you behind your back. It's true.
Anonymous wrote:I've responded to this sort of thread before, although I can't find the links right now--I looked into this given talk of redshirting on DCUM (had never heard of it before), and also because my 3yo has a September bday.
Anyway, I remember reading that the research doesn't really support redshirting. It basically said that the little bit of an edge redshirting give kids as far as academics and sports early on fades by the time they get to high school. Basically, these kids don't have to try as hard, because they're bigger and smarter and faster than their peers. However, if your kid is the one of youngest in the class, they'll have to try really hard to keep up with their older classmates--and they'll benefit cognitively from that in the long run.
One of the studies I can recall was by Stanford (of Stanford & Binet fame). They looked at kids who had IQs in the top 1% of the population. Kids who were young for their grade were over-represented in the sample.
There are more of these studies, along with a couple of NYT and other articles about the topic, if anyone else can find them (I just got home and have stuff to do).