Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fail to see the problem with this. The kids should understand that what they post has consequences. It would be one thing if they hacked into private accounts or something, but if they're posting stuff publicly, they have to face the consequences. It's not like students have freedom or speech or anything.
Of course they have freedom of speech.
Freedom to cheat?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fail to see the problem with this. The kids should understand that what they post has consequences. It would be one thing if they hacked into private accounts or something, but if they're posting stuff publicly, they have to face the consequences. It's not like students have freedom or speech or anything.
Of course they have freedom of speech.
Anonymous wrote:I fail to see the problem with this. The kids should understand that what they post has consequences. It would be one thing if they hacked into private accounts or something, but if they're posting stuff publicly, they have to face the consequences. It's not like students have freedom or speech or anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fail to see the problem with this. The kids should understand that what they post has consequences. It would be one thing if they hacked into private accounts or something, but if they're posting stuff publicly, they have to face the consequences. It's not like students have freedom or speech or anything.
My understanding is that the student did not post the question. That the DOE called his school is concerning.
Not really. Again: Students do not have freedom of speech. Are we clear on that?
What? Yes they do, when they're outside of school.
Anonymous wrote:I know, right? When we were kids, we took lots of high-stakes tests, and when we distributed the questions among friends, it was fine. Now they say it's "cheating".
I don't know when you went to school, but I did not have ANY high-stakes tests. We had some Iowa tests, but they were not high stakes, so there was no cheating. They did not affect grades, graduation, etc. The atmosphere for those was nothing like it is for the ones they have now.
You must have gone through school during NCLB or shortly before it if you had lots of high-stakes tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fail to see the problem with this. The kids should understand that what they post has consequences. It would be one thing if they hacked into private accounts or something, but if they're posting stuff publicly, they have to face the consequences. It's not like students have freedom or speech or anything.
My understanding is that the student did not post the question. That the DOE called his school is concerning.
Not really. Again: Students do not have freedom of speech. Are we clear on that?
PARCC should change the questions each year.
I know, right? When we were kids, we took lots of high-stakes tests, and when we distributed the questions among friends, it was fine. Now they say it's "cheating".
Why on EARTH would they counseled to "opt out" of the PARCC? That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. They have these tests for a very good reason.