Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to stalk me! Good for you!Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Lord, girl, not stalking you, just can't swing a dead cat in this town without bumping into one of your bitchy anti-dci posts!![]()
You're so insecure because DCI's program is a failing one. Don't blame posters telling the truth. Blame the school. Secondly, there was nothing bitchy about a comment saying the school has an inappropriate tech focus. What is bitchy is you and the DCI boosters who can't stand criticism. Stalker is correct for you!
I've not heard it was failing from anywhere. Quite the contrary in fact.
+1. DCI is what? 2 yrs old. It's not failing. It's barely started. Don't we all want more good middle school options? Don't understand the venom, it's like they want DCI to fail.
We are at a feeder and have no problem with the tech focus... Consider it a plus for our tech savvy kid with bad handwriting: we requested keyboarding for him and our feeder provides him with a chrome book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to stalk me! Good for you!Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Lord, girl, not stalking you, just can't swing a dead cat in this town without bumping into one of your bitchy anti-dci posts!![]()
You're so insecure because DCI's program is a failing one. Don't blame posters telling the truth. Blame the school. Secondly, there was nothing bitchy about a comment saying the school has an inappropriate tech focus. What is bitchy is you and the DCI boosters who can't stand criticism. Stalker is correct for you!
I've not heard it was failing from anywhere. Quite the contrary in fact.
+1. DCI is what? 2 yrs old. It's not failing. It's barely started. Don't we all want more good middle school options? Don't understand the venom, it's like they want DCI to fail.
We are at a feeder and have no problem with the tech focus... Consider it a plus for our tech savvy kid with bad handwriting: we requested keyboarding for him and our feeder provides him with a chrome book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to stalk me! Good for you!Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Lord, girl, not stalking you, just can't swing a dead cat in this town without bumping into one of your bitchy anti-dci posts!![]()
You're so insecure because DCI's program is a failing one. Don't blame posters telling the truth. Blame the school. Secondly, there was nothing bitchy about a comment saying the school has an inappropriate tech focus. What is bitchy is you and the DCI boosters who can't stand criticism. Stalker is correct for you!
I've not heard it was failing from anywhere. Quite the contrary in fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Not the PP, but it is entirely unproductive to equate "too much tech" opinions with being "anti-DCI". We were THRILLED with the idea of DCI and still are, but we are concerned about the tech focus too. That is simply not the same as being "anti-DCI" and the more people keep equating them, the further away from solutions this conversation gets.
Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get a grip. The tech heavy program is not appropriate. Simple. Stop trying to make it difficult. It's not rocket science. Tech foci for middle schools is damaging. DCI can try to dance around that all they want. The bottom line is it's bad. If they would change that we all wouldn't be hear espousing our views. They're not budging and so they are going to lose a lot of parents.
just don't send your kid there. we don't all have to agree with you.
Anonymous wrote:Get a grip. The tech heavy program is not appropriate. Simple. Stop trying to make it difficult. It's not rocket science. Tech foci for middle schools is damaging. DCI can try to dance around that all they want. The bottom line is it's bad. If they would change that we all wouldn't be hear espousing our views. They're not budging and so they are going to lose a lot of parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to stalk me! Good for you!Anonymous wrote:wow. whoever you are, you sure get your anti-dci posts in on every possible thread!!!
Lord, girl, not stalking you, just can't swing a dead cat in this town without bumping into one of your bitchy anti-dci posts!![]()
You're so insecure because DCI's program is a failing one. Don't blame posters telling the truth. Blame the school. Secondly, there was nothing bitchy about a comment saying the school has an inappropriate tech focus. What is bitchy is you and the DCI boosters who can't stand criticism. Stalker is correct for you!