Anonymous wrote:I sometimes wonder if there is a shill from the WTU who complains about all and any testing which could reveal holes in the schooling our kids are receiving...
Anonymous wrote:I sometimes wonder if there is a shill from the WTU who complains about all and any testing which could reveal holes in the schooling our kids are receiving...
Anonymous wrote:Opted my kids out without any pushback from Principals.
I will just keep my kids home during that time (yes, I do work). I don't expect the school to provide another activity for them. It is only a few hours on a few days.
Anonymous wrote:The pernicious trend is the watering down of education, and the un-evenness of educational experience. Without testing, how will we know that Child A can't do division, and isn't ready for preAlgebra?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious - if you are so opposed to testing why do you send your child to public schools? Its not just about the couple days spent taking the test but the fact that the curriculum is designed around the test. If you are so opposed to the test that you would consider not sending your child to school those days why would you send them at all.
Are you paid to sit around and bully parents who are taking a stand against a pernicious trend in PUBLIC education? Or do you do it for fun?
Anonymous wrote:keep him home. The school isn't obligated to provide entertainment or instruction for your child while he is opting out of participating in the school-wide activity. Testing requires extra hands on deck(volunteer proctors) even without the conscientious objectors underfootAnonymous wrote:I want to know what the formal "opt out" process is for DCPS. I am very much against PARCC/corporate testing and its effect on the curriculum. However, I don't want my child penalized for not taking the exam and I don't want him to sit in a room twiddling his thumbs all day. Ideas?
Anonymous wrote:There is no formal opt out (confirmed at a recent meeting with DCPS PARCC officials). So your options are medical reasons or truancy, neither of which - to me! - seem wroth the trouble of potentially harming your child's records.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious - if you are so opposed to testing why do you send your child to public schools? Its not just about the couple days spent taking the test but the fact that the curriculum is designed around the test. If you are so opposed to the test that you would consider not sending your child to school those days why would you send them at all.
Are you paid to sit around and bully parents who are taking a stand against a pernicious trend in PUBLIC education? Or do you do it for fun?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious - if you are so opposed to testing why do you send your child to public schools? Its not just about the couple days spent taking the test but the fact that the curriculum is designed around the test. If you are so opposed to the test that you would consider not sending your child to school those days why would you send them at all.
![]()
Oh, I dunno. Maybe the OP likes the rest of what happens at school. Since many people seem to think that these tests are NBD, obviously y'all must know that standardized testing is only a small part of a public school experience.
back at you. The "rest of what happens at school" -- recess, friends, kind teachers, lunch, aftercare, gym -- can be had at any not-public school. Even 'walkability' in the District of Columbia, which is the geographic location that we're talking about here (MoCO, Iowa and California readers stay silent now).
maybe you should read, check the archives...there have been people protesting against testing since forever...doesn't matter if it was the CAS or the PIA or the predecessors...Anonymous wrote:^^^ at least now we know the level of ignorance we are dealing with. Nobody is against testing. Read a bit more on the subject.
The pernicious trend is the watering down of education, and the un-evenness of educational experience. Without testing, how will we know that Child A can't do division, and isn't ready for preAlgebra?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious - if you are so opposed to testing why do you send your child to public schools? Its not just about the couple days spent taking the test but the fact that the curriculum is designed around the test. If you are so opposed to the test that you would consider not sending your child to school those days why would you send them at all.
Are you paid to sit around and bully parents who are taking a stand against a pernicious trend in PUBLIC education? Or do you do it for fun?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious - if you are so opposed to testing why do you send your child to public schools? Its not just about the couple days spent taking the test but the fact that the curriculum is designed around the test. If you are so opposed to the test that you would consider not sending your child to school those days why would you send them at all.