Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like he left sports equipment or an instrument behind. If that's the case, I don't know that I'd punish too severely. We all forget things once in a while, even when trying to be careful. I like the idea of reducing his allowance a bit.
That's 7000 dollars?
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like he left sports equipment or an instrument behind. If that's the case, I don't know that I'd punish too severely. We all forget things once in a while, even when trying to be careful. I like the idea of reducing his allowance a bit.
Anonymous wrote:he is only twelve, mistakes happen, he feels terrible, and if he doesn't go to camp, he won't really have anything to do over the summer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he leave a faucet running and flood something?
OP here. Prefer not to be specific for privacy reasons, but something along these lines--it was a case of forgetting something--again, in a situation where under no uncertain terms he knew he had to be responsible about it.
Anonymous wrote:Do you think punishing him by canceling a trip that is months away will make him more responsible next time? And that feeling horrible now isn't enough to teach him that? My guess is that at 12, there is no guarantee, no matter what you do, that he won't be a bonehead again. So I wouldn't punish just for the sake of punishment, and I certainly wouldn't punish the whole family by taking away something that promotes family sanity and happiness, like camp and trips. I would make sure he feels the fallout and makes things better. If he flooded the house, he rolls up his sleeves and hauls out the wet carpet and works hard on the cleaning. If he broke the big screen TV he helps clean it up, haul it to the dump, put allowance into the new one, and misses TV for a while. Etc.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am offbase but to me this is like if you break something at work. Even if it was your fault and the mistake costs thousands they can't expect you to be financially responsible.
There can be consequences, but the idea that you would somehow hold a 12 year liable for $7k seems a little crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe I am offbase but to me this is like if you break something at work. Even if it was your fault and the mistake costs thousands they can't expect you to be financially responsible.
There can be consequences, but the idea that you would somehow hold a 12 year liable for $7k seems a little crazy.