Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry - I meant to highlight everything BUT the first sentence to your original response.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD also got a 16 last year with very detailed examples as well. She also top out both tests so we weren't surprised by the high GBRS. Just one year into AAP but she loves it and has made many more friends this year.
Thanks for bragging.
not bragging.
She's basically sheldon-level smart, which you can understand is not always easy. i wasn't bragging but relaying our experience.
Our other child is a little ahead of the average. He has a photographic memory but can't make the connections on concepts that DD does. So, less problems with him socially or athletically, but AAP may not be for him. Either way I don't care which program they're in as long as it is the best fit for them. AAP is clearly the better fit for our DD.
It was bragging. What is highlighted in bold was non-responsive, extraneous information you couldn't help but throw in.
I can also definitively tell you that you don't have a kid that is need of a special ed program for highly gifted kids (or it was meant to be) because you would know it's not bragging.
Also, next time I post an answer I'll run it by you to ensure I don't add anything non-responsive or extraneous. FWIW, I know very well how to respond in a direct manner. I manage a [b]$1.5B[b] program, write policy and congressional testimony as part of my job and I'm certainly not going to give my responses on an anonymous forum much thought after the type of work I do all day. And for the record, THAT was bragging (see bold).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to know about my DS's GBRS. Someone has mentioned that it is available to parents AFTER school submits to the committee. Does anyone know when would be a good time to ask for the GBRS ?
Schools need to submit students' files by early March--I think the 5th or 6th. You should ask the AART after then to see your child's file, which of course will have the GBRS.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to know about my DS's GBRS. Someone has mentioned that it is available to parents AFTER school submits to the committee. Does anyone know when would be a good time to ask for the GBRS ?
Anonymous wrote:I'm the other PP whose son had a 16. Any special needs? Did you do a WISC for the appeal?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the school. I teach music in FCPS, and my AART said they're rare. She said there were 2 in our whole school. I asked because my own son with borderline test scores had a 16. He was not admitted with a 16. I will say, both schools have a significant high-need population.
I am surprised that he didn't get in with a 16. Really surprised.
New poster here. My son also had a 16 and borderline test scores. He was initially rejected. His teacher encouraged us to appeal. We did and he was admitted. I would have never known his GBRS if he was not initially rejected.
I'm the other PP whose son had a 16. Any special needs? Did you do a WISC for the appeal?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the school. I teach music in FCPS, and my AART said they're rare. She said there were 2 in our whole school. I asked because my own son with borderline test scores had a 16. He was not admitted with a 16. I will say, both schools have a significant high-need population.
I am surprised that he didn't get in with a 16. Really surprised.
New poster here. My son also had a 16 and borderline test scores. He was initially rejected. His teacher encouraged us to appeal. We did and he was admitted. I would have never known his GBRS if he was not initially rejected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the school. I teach music in FCPS, and my AART said they're rare. She said there were 2 in our whole school. I asked because my own son with borderline test scores had a 16. He was not admitted with a 16. I will say, both schools have a significant high-need population.
I am surprised that he didn't get in with a 16. Really surprised.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry - I meant to highlight everything BUT the first sentence to your original response.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD also got a 16 last year with very detailed examples as well. She also top out both tests so we weren't surprised by the high GBRS. Just one year into AAP but she loves it and has made many more friends this year.
Thanks for bragging.
not bragging.
She's basically sheldon-level smart, which you can understand is not always easy. i wasn't bragging but relaying our experience.
Our other child is a little ahead of the average. He has a photographic memory but can't make the connections on concepts that DD does. So, less problems with him socially or athletically, but AAP may not be for him. Either way I don't care which program they're in as long as it is the best fit for them. AAP is clearly the better fit for our DD.
It was bragging. What is highlighted in bold was non-responsive, extraneous information you couldn't help but throw in.
Sorry - I meant to highlight everything BUT the first sentence to your original response.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD also got a 16 last year with very detailed examples as well. She also top out both tests so we weren't surprised by the high GBRS. Just one year into AAP but she loves it and has made many more friends this year.
Thanks for bragging.
not bragging.
She's basically sheldon-level smart, which you can understand is not always easy. i wasn't bragging but relaying our experience.
Our other child is a little ahead of the average. He has a photographic memory but can't make the connections on concepts that DD does. So, less problems with him socially or athletically, but AAP may not be for him. Either way I don't care which program they're in as long as it is the best fit for them. AAP is clearly the better fit for our DD.
It was bragging. What is highlighted in bold was non-responsive, extraneous information you couldn't help but throw in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD also got a 16 last year with very detailed examples as well. She also top out both tests so we weren't surprised by the high GBRS. Just one year into AAP but she loves it and has made many more friends this year.
Thanks for bragging.
not bragging.
She's basically sheldon-level smart, which you can understand is not always easy. i wasn't bragging but relaying our experience.
Our other child is a little ahead of the average. He has a photographic memory but can't make the connections on concepts that DD does. So, less problems with him socially or athletically, but AAP may not be for him. Either way I don't care which program they're in as long as it is the best fit for them. AAP is clearly the better fit for our DD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD also got a 16 last year with very detailed examples as well. She also top out both tests so we weren't surprised by the high GBRS. Just one year into AAP but she loves it and has made many more friends this year.
Thanks for bragging.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid had a 15 but was not in the pool by a long shot. Her nnat and cogat scores were very average (80th to 95th percentile with one subset in the 60s). We had a wisc done and her score was 138. She is doing very well in the program. No idea why her standardized tests came in so low. But glad that her teacher gave her a good write up and the committee took a chance on the whole child.
Since when is "80th to 95th percentile with one subset in the 60s" AVERAGE, for goodness sake? Isn't around the 50th percentile "average" by definition?