Anonymous
02/04/2015 09:05
Subject: Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
She said "it is an upper class thing" and then said she wears boots and tights to a formal event. That is a a moron.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 09:00
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
You can be frumpy at any age.
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
I'm frumpy for wearing Wolford tights with my boots? I think it looks ridiculous to wear boots with bare legs.
The question was about formal attire. You and your boots can wear suntan leggs in the egg. Moron.
Why are you calling strangers a moron? Not my fault you're single. You should be nicer and then a man might be interested in you.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:55
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
You can be frumpy at any age.
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
I'm frumpy for wearing Wolford tights with my boots? I think it looks ridiculous to wear boots with bare legs.
The question was about formal attire. You and your boots can wear suntan leggs in the egg. Moron.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:52
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
The question was about a formal event. You and your boots and tights will fit right in. Moron.
You can be frumpy at any age.
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
I'm frumpy for wearing Wolford tights with my boots? I think it looks ridiculous to wear boots with bare legs.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:49
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
You can be frumpy at any age.
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
I'm frumpy for wearing Wolford tights with my boots? I think it looks ridiculous to wear boots with bare legs.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:20
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
You can be frumpy at any age.
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:20
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Go look at the David Patrick Columbia site and check out photos of formal events. See what the women are wearing and if they have bare legs.
Exactly. All bare.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:17
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Go look at the David Patrick Columbia site and check out photos of formal events. See what the women are wearing and if they have bare legs.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:14
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
You sound Jewish.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:13
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Black tights or bare legs. Those screaming for hose have never lived in NYC.
I'm not screaming for hose but I'm screaming for the op to wear so.ething on her legs. Especially if it is an upscale event and it is snowing out like it has been in new York.
Anonymous
02/04/2015 08:11
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
And you seem rude. I'm 5 foot 4 and 110 lbs and 31. I'm not old. However, even if I were old and out of shape I would be happy. I love my Wolford tights and so do my friends here and in NY. Maybe it is an upper class thing, who knows?
Anonymous
02/03/2015 22:57
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Black tights or bare legs. Those screaming for hose have never lived in NYC.
Anonymous
02/03/2015 22:11
Subject: Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
It may depend somewhat on industry / circle, but to me as a longtime NYC publishing industry person, hose (even black ones) immediately date a woman as older or more out of it. You still see them in DC more but (at least in my circles) less so in NYC. it's too cold for bare legs I'd go with black tights.
Anonymous
02/03/2015 22:05
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.
You are either old or out of shape (or both)
Anonymous
02/03/2015 19:41
Subject: Re:Tights or hose with formal cocktail dress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wear sheer hose. Never in a million years would I go bare.
No need to be frumpy just because you're old.
In the NE women wear tights or hoisery of some sort. Wearing bare legs would be like wearing flip flops in January. It simply isn't done.
No, no and no. According to Tim Gunn "Bare legs are always the more fashionable option."
Where, in NJ? I attended quite a few high end events when living in NY and don't ever remember women wirh bare legs in the winter. My husband went to boarding school and his friends are not slumming it in manhattan. Sure, maybe women don't wear tights to the golden globes, but I wouldn't try and pull off any of those dresses at something outside of Hollywood or a fashion industry event. For a normal cocktail event in Manhattan you wear tights or hoisery. Guarantee most fashionable women in NY know Wolford and very well.