Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.tjhsst.edu/~dhyatt/graphics/garden.html
The home of Don Hyatt in Fairfax is one of the first ones that comes to mind. . .
That is a lovely landscape. I cannot imagine anyone rejecting something like that on their street.
I think that there are landscapes that, while probably environmentally correct, lack the design strengths of the landscape in the photos. I know of a couple properties, near where I live, that do look out of place and lack connection with the adjoining yards and seem to cry for some organization. They both have a habitat sign in front, I guess to explain the appearance.
This is a 77 acre property, this is his full time retirement hobby and he still has grass. Please post an example of this on your typical 1/4 acre lot neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.tjhsst.edu/~dhyatt/graphics/garden.html
The home of Don Hyatt in Fairfax is one of the first ones that comes to mind. . .
That is a lovely landscape. I cannot imagine anyone rejecting something like that on their street.
I think that there are landscapes that, while probably environmentally correct, lack the design strengths of the landscape in the photos. I know of a couple properties, near where I live, that do look out of place and lack connection with the adjoining yards and seem to cry for some organization. They both have a habitat sign in front, I guess to explain the appearance.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.tjhsst.edu/~dhyatt/graphics/garden.html
The home of Don Hyatt in Fairfax is one of the first ones that comes to mind. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This always makes the house look trashy. No one does this unless you like in a drought like area.
I think that my neighbors (and our collective home values) would disagree with you. We haven't gone the native route yet, but I think we will soon. If it is done well, it looks so good, and SO much less work!
Anonymous wrote:This always makes the house look trashy. No one does this unless you like in a drought like area.
Anonymous wrote:awful
Anonymous wrote:Ps you can also replace lawn area with buffalo grass. It a great way to prep an area for covertion.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Are you going to have time to weed it or pay someone else to weed it? Garden beds are a lot more time consuming than a lawn. I don't use postcodes on my lawn and only fertilize once a year because I have a mulching mower. Are you going to be able to compost all the garden trimmings our will some end up in a landfill? There are a few weeds but it looks good enough for me. Maybe when I retire I'll turn the while thing into a garden, but it would be too much of a time suck. You could go for a bigger front garden but still maintain a little grass, which would give you more continuity with your neighbors. A water source for wildlife and more native plants would be a good idea in either .
Lawns are more intensive, but people have been train to do the work. A properly mulched bed is easy to maintain and is a lot easier vs a lawn.
I speak from experience of doing my own lawn care and gardening. I love working in the garden, and am not a big fan of lawncare, but the gardens take time to weed even with mulch. My garden beds are mostly full sun, which means that they get more weeds than shady areas. And we have problems with zoysia grass with tough underground stems invading our garden beds from our neighbors' lawns, which is the worst to try to pull up.