Anonymous wrote:
If she'd been born a week earlier, it wouldn't be early entrance, it would be going on time. Or would you recommend redshirting?
I would seriously consider it.
Much better to be the younger than the oldest if your kid is ahead of the curve.
Anonymous wrote:
But she didn't wait a year. She went on time.
PP's DD missed by one day. OP is talking about sending her child early.
But she didn't wait a year. She went on time.
Anonymous wrote:DD has October 1st birthday, which, in Virginia, meant she was the absolute oldest (the cutoff is September 30th). I was very worried, as she was quite advanced (yes, I know, all parents say that). Well, she thrived in elementary and in high school. She developed amazing leadership skills and was unafraid to become involved in all sorts of activities. She's now at one of the HYP universities. I don't think waiting a year harmed her in any way.
Anonymous wrote:I think the advantages of waiting outweigh the disadvantages.
Anonymous wrote:]Mom insisted on sending very bright Sept bday boy against the advice of Preschool teacher. K teacher also recommend another year in K, but mom refused as he had excellent academics. He was a GT kid and tested into old GT center. Mediocre performance in high school. College drop out.
This kid is extremely bright. He is a good kid—not in trouble. I can’t help but wonder what another year would have done for him. We will never know. He was socially immature, though.