Anonymous wrote:I have a kindergartener and an older kid in Mcps and have been thrilled with 4 out of 5 teachers. The other one wasnt terrible, just not stellar. The difference between the okay teachers and the great ones are that the great ones are able to keep tabs on which kids need what and tailor accordingly. I am astounded at how well the kindergarten teachers we have do this. Do I wish there was less testing? Yes, but so do the teachers and principals. Are the report cards dumb? Yes, but the teachers are great about communicating actual strengths/challenges. I'm sure that you can get more from certain privates but until people stop complaIning about their taxes, it's really unfair to expect MCPS to give the same customized experience as a school that costs 20k to 40k a year and is not required to educate the more challenged children.
+1
My one DC is in HGC and has had a few great teachers. My other DC had a pretty good K experience - jumped a whole grade in reading while in K. And good teachers will know how to differentiate and provide acceleration in class. From K-2, kids are grouped by reading and math ability.
But, it is true, generally, public schools have larger class sizes so your DC won't get a lot of individualized attention. But, you know what, plenty of kids do great without a lot of individualized attention.
There's some creativity going on in K, but there is of course some standard learning, as well.
Every parent has different opinions on what they value in K-2 learning, and MCPS is certainly not going to cater to everyone's needs or wants. That doesn't mean that MCPS bad. It's just not everyone's cup of tea. For me, I don't want my K to just be doing creative stuff all day. Yes, I do want my DC to have some rules and learn the "this is how you do it" way.