Anonymous wrote:
I apologize if my questions are silly. This is my first born, which means I haven't seen an SAT test in 30 years!
Your questions are far from silly! My SAT scores from 30 years ago wouldn't get me into a matchbook trade school today but got me into a pretty good college yesteryear. Go figure.
Slightly off topic, but for parents who think their SAT scores from way back aren't so great compared to what colleges want today, you should know that the SAT scoring was "recentered" a number of years ago. There's a chart on line where you can compare your old score and see what it would be under today's scoring guidelines. Most people are pleasantly surprised!
Here's the link:
http://research.collegeboard.org/programs/sat/data/equivalence/sat-individual
I apologize if my questions are silly. This is my first born, which means I haven't seen an SAT test in 30 years!
Your questions are far from silly! My SAT scores from 30 years ago wouldn't get me into a matchbook trade school today but got me into a pretty good college yesteryear. Go figure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. And I would try it first. The SAT can be emotionally deflating especially to kids who really are bright but don't test well with the SAT. I know a few kids who got a serious ego boost with the ACT after bombing on the SAT.Anonymous wrote:DEFINITELY try the ACT. Our DC did and score in the upper 90s percentile. Slightly better overall that the SAT but in one area, much better. The ACT works better for many students.
OP here - This would be my DD for sure. She is a bright girl - not gifted. Tests poorly, and it is very upsetting to her. This is very helpful information.
Anonymous wrote:+1. And I would try it first. The SAT can be emotionally deflating especially to kids who really are bright but don't test well with the SAT. I know a few kids who got a serious ego boost with the ACT after bombing on the SAT.Anonymous wrote:DEFINITELY try the ACT. Our DC did and score in the upper 90s percentile. Slightly better overall that the SAT but in one area, much better. The ACT works better for many students.
Anonymous wrote:OP, this article was just wriiten 8 hours ago so the information is definitely current and should bring you up to speed.
http://m.ibtimes.com/sat-vs-act-facts-help-decide-which-college-entrance-exam-you-should-take-1777944
+1. And I would try it first. The SAT can be emotionally deflating especially to kids who really are bright but don't test well with the SAT. I know a few kids who got a serious ego boost with the ACT after bombing on the SAT.Anonymous wrote:DEFINITELY try the ACT. Our DC did and score in the upper 90s percentile. Slightly better overall that the SAT but in one area, much better. The ACT works better for many students.
Anonymous wrote:Apparently there's a diagnostic test you can take to determine whether your kid is ACT or SAT material, although I didn't know about it until after we'd identified the ACT for our DCs. I would limit this year's task to figuring out which test is best. Then start working on practice tests this summer, with the goal of taking the first test in late spring of junior year. Then you'll have summer before senior year to get ready for another round, if necessary. If your DD is disciplined enough to do practice tests on her own, don't bother with the test prep courses. Just get a tutor to work on specific math skills or reading strategies -- those seem to be the two biggest areas of weakness.
Literally the best day of the whole college process for us was when our last child got her ACT score and it was in range for her target schools. All the practice books went straight to the trash. Unless you're a natural, those tests are pure torture.
Anonymous wrote:Remember she doesn't need both tests (ACT and SAT). Find out which test she prefers and have her focus on that test. SAT involves more "read" between the lines skills and ACT is more straight test but faster moving test.