Anonymous wrote:Then it is unlikely that these kids will be adopted by wealthy families. I have seen some real loser foster moms.
Anonymous wrote:It's because of all the time commitments. You might have, say, birth parent visitation twice a week. Birth extended family visits monthly and for holidays. Maintaining relationships with birth siblings in different living situations. Court sometimes, which often requires waiting around all day. Sometimes you have a lawyer and you have to meet with the lawyer. Whatever medical problems the kid has, plus early intervention stuff like speech therapy. Being home for caseworker visits at the appointed time. Catching up on missed dentist, eye doctor, etc. A nanny can do a lot of this stuff, but for much of it, the parent must be present. And much of it happens during the week.
I don't want to put anyone off it, because fostering is a wonderful thing. But it's important to be realistic about the logistics. I look forward to fostering if I take early retirement.
Anonymous wrote:I've started the application to be in foster parent, and the agency was clear that they'd love to have me and that the fact that I worked full time wasn't an issue.
I've also taught many kids in foster care. Other than kids in therapeutic placements, I've only ever had one pair of siblings whose foster parent stayed home.
Foster agencies in DC do require that the child be either with you, with another adult who has passed their background check (which can take a couple months) or at a licensed daycare or home daycare. Nannies are problematic because you'll need childcare while they go through the background check, and then you're up a creek if they quit or get sick, but daycare is fine.
In DC you get a childcare voucher, and childcare vouchers can only be used at daycares that accept subsidy. You can pay for another placement, or a nanny (if you can figure out the background check thing), but it'll come out of your pocket.