+1Anonymous wrote:Oh good lord. I'm the first PP and I wasn't being pro-Capitol Hill or anti-Capitol Hill. I don't think we need to beat that dead horse any more. Just making the point that a neighborhood does not have to be new construction to have underground power lines.
Anonymous wrote:I am not so much worried about losing power (even though it is inconvenient.). I just think it looks kind of junky to have above ground power lines. My German neighbor commented that our Bethesda neighborhood "reminded her of Mexico City" when she moved here because of the above ground power lines.
Anonymous wrote:All of Burke. We still lose power a lot though.
Anonymous wrote:In Washington, much of Woodley Park, Spring Valley and Kalorama also have buried lines.
I agree that this should be a priority. With buried lines, you can have both reliable power AND a healthy tree canopy (not those unstable trees hollowed out by PEPCOs hired butchers). And a dense tree canopy enhances power reliability in other ways by cooling the city and reducing power demand on hot summer days, thereby also reducing the potential of power brownouts and blackouts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Capitol Hill is not new at all, but the power lines are all underground. Never lost power once in the 15 years I lived there.
Op is probably looking for a real house not a row house
Well, then she can enjoy it in the dark.
Meanwhile, here on the Hill we'll be watching the story on the news and wondering, as always, "Why would anyone pay a fortune to live with electricity that is less reliable than in most parts of the third world?"