Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public school uniforms kind of shout tough urban school IMHO.
I bet my alma mater, Holton-Arms, would beg to differ. Uniforms are fine. All the TMNT shirts can become a distraction.
Anonymous wrote:Public school uniforms kind of shout tough urban school IMHO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniform influenced why we selected a school other than AppleTree.
I could not imagine getting my child who wore a skirt over a dress into a uniform daily.
Appletree has uniforms? I had no idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are a passe gimmick, a throwback to the early 1990s era of tough love, all-male classes and late night basketball leagues to turn around tough, ungovernable urban schools. I don't think that uniforms help much, but if folks feel they're necessary, then the question is what other issues are going on beneath the surface. In the Hardy case, new and prospective parents see the uniforms as a vestige of the "old" polarized Hardy that rose up against Michelle Rhee, and want to move on.
So says the completely out-of-touch with DC Ward 3 resident.
I beg to differ. With a Kindergartner in a Title I school, we're grateful that uniforms remove at least one of the SES dynamics/indicators, and since this is S2S, it is perhaps one of the most important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just wondering why all the hate on school uniforms (a la the Hardy threads). My kids (elementary and middle) go to charters that don't have uniforms but I wouldn't object if they did.
I think uniforms are necessary in some contexts (police) but in general I don't like conformity imposed on people for no good reason, especially at such a young age. I also don't like it when fast food restaurants impose uniform policies, or any other workplace where there isn't a strong rationale. I don't see the reason to limit people's expression and style. Where and when I grew up, uniforms were very rare in public schools, and it always seems odd to me.
Anonymous wrote:Just wondering why all the hate on school uniforms (a la the Hardy threads). My kids (elementary and middle) go to charters that don't have uniforms but I wouldn't object if they did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are a passe gimmick, a throwback to the early 1990s era of tough love, all-male classes and late night basketball leagues to turn around tough, ungovernable urban schools. I don't think that uniforms help much, but if folks feel they're necessary, then the question is what other issues are going on beneath the surface. In the Hardy case, new and prospective parents see the uniforms as a vestige of the "old" polarized Hardy that rose up against Michelle Rhee, and want to move on.
So says the completely out-of-touch with DC Ward 3 resident.
I beg to differ. With a Kindergartner in a Title I school, we're grateful that uniforms remove at least one of the SES dynamics/indicators, and since this is S2S, it is perhaps one of the most important.
Anonymous wrote:Uniform influenced why we selected a school other than AppleTree.
I could not imagine getting my child who wore a skirt over a dress into a uniform daily.