Anonymous wrote:Also, how many were under siege like the people in Benghazi? How many Americans were killed?
Anonymous wrote:That old canard does not include organized attacks that went on for hours. Also, how many American ambassadors were targeted?
Anonymous wrote:Where were the republican congressional committees then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1). This was not Gowdy's report. I'll wait for that
2) It does no such thing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews
In fact, it says the WH twisted things and stuck to talking points about the video, etc
I suggest you read the article I posted above, which digs deeper into the report. Left media is already attacking FOx, which tells me Fox is clearly onto something
Uh, it's only 37 pages. If you haven't read it you should not post on who has "dug deeper".
Also, the report contained 17 findings, specifically enumerated in the report. The title of the article you posted did not refer to a single one of those. I wonder why.
Again, I will wait fir Gowdy's. I am more concerned with an AWOL president and a State Dept weeding through documents. My husband, a liberal, said the report did not exonorate anyone, in fact, it was clear that not enough security was provided, there was much confusion,etc. i suggest you read the recent book tgat came out. Those men were there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1). This was not Gowdy's report. I'll wait for that
2) It does no such thing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews
In fact, it says the WH twisted things and stuck to talking points about the video, etc
I suggest you read the article I posted above, which digs deeper into the report. Left media is already attacking FOx, which tells me Fox is clearly onto something
Uh, it's only 37 pages. If you haven't read it you should not post on who has "dug deeper".
Also, the report contained 17 findings, specifically enumerated in the report. The title of the article you posted did not refer to a single one of those. I wonder why.
Again, I will wait fir Gowdy's. I am more concerned with an AWOL president and a State Dept weeding through documents. My husband, a liberal, said the report did not exonorate anyone, in fact, it was clear that not enough security was provided, there was much confusion,etc. i suggest you read the recent book tgat came out. Those men were there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1). This was not Gowdy's report. I'll wait for that
2) It does no such thing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews
In fact, it says the WH twisted things and stuck to talking points about the video, etc
I suggest you read the article I posted above, which digs deeper into the report. Left media is already attacking FOx, which tells me Fox is clearly onto something
Uh, it's only 37 pages. If you haven't read it you should not post on who has "dug deeper".
Also, the report contained 17 findings, specifically enumerated in the report. The title of the article you posted did not refer to a single one of those. I wonder why.
Anonymous wrote:1). This was not Gowdy's report. I'll wait for that
2) It does no such thing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews
In fact, it says the WH twisted things and stuck to talking points about the video, etc
I suggest you read the article I posted above, which digs deeper into the report. Left media is already attacking FOx, which tells me Fox is clearly onto something
Anonymous wrote:Show me the part where Clinton is exonerated.
Anonymous wrote:Page one. All of the key claims about Benghazi were debunked, from whether they deliberately lied about the cause, to whether there was a stand down order, to whether there was a denial of air support. You all were full of shit on this one, and the House Intelligence Committee, the committee with actual access to intelligence AND run by Republicans, said so bluntly and up front.
You must not have read the part about the "innacuracies" and the "flawed assessments."
In total,analysts received 21 reports that a protest occurred in Benghazi -- fourteen from the Open Source Center, one from CIA, two from DoD and four from NSA