Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, part of the dining experience is richness of the conversation that comes from diners of all backgrounds and experiences. It's not just about the food that the waiters serve you, but about the way the tables are arranged so as to mix up the diners and promote enlightening conversations. The owners of the restaurant recognize that not all diners can afford their restaurant, but they want that richness that diversity brings to their table conversations, and so they offer their meals at a discounted or even free rate to some.
All diners know this going in. Some have more money than they know what to do with, and some save and scrimp to eat there. But they feel it's worth it because the food and the service AND the rich conversation from the many and varied diners makes it a completely wonderful dining experience. There is no resentment on their part that others do not pay because they recognize the value those others bring AND they're not petty morons.
NP here. But the problem is, the "diversity" that these diners eating free bring is fake diversity. They are people who are basically just like me, but for whatever reason, they cannot afford the meal. They all went to college themselves and have good jobs, but maybe they are working in non-profits, say, or they have chosen to become teachers instead of law firm partners, or whatever. They have the same basic manners, the same basic interest in eating in a good restaurant, the same conversation skills, etc. "Rich and varied" diversity means bringing in people that most people dining in the restaurant would not want there in the first place, thus breeding the resentment that OP describes.
Anonymous wrote:Judging by your taste in restaurants OP all of the excellent arguments and suggestions offered by PPs will be lost on you. Maybe you should cook at home.
Anonymous wrote:
NP here. But the problem is, the "diversity" that these diners eating free bring is fake diversity. They are people who are basically just like me, but for whatever reason, they cannot afford the meal. They all went to college themselves and have good jobs, but maybe they are working in non-profits, say, or they have chosen to become teachers instead of law firm partners, or whatever. They have the same basic manners, the same basic interest in eating in a good restaurant, the same conversation skills, etc. "Rich and varied" diversity means bringing in people that most people dining in the restaurant would not want there in the first place, thus breeding the resentment that OP describes.
Anonymous wrote:OP, part of the dining experience is richness of the conversation that comes from diners of all backgrounds and experiences. It's not just about the food that the waiters serve you, but about the way the tables are arranged so as to mix up the diners and promote enlightening conversations. The owners of the restaurant recognize that not all diners can afford their restaurant, but they want that richness that diversity brings to their table conversations, and so they offer their meals at a discounted or even free rate to some.
All diners know this going in. Some have more money than they know what to do with, and some save and scrimp to eat there. But they feel it's worth it because the food and the service AND the rich conversation from the many and varied diners makes it a completely wonderful dining experience. There is no resentment on their part that others do not pay because they recognize the value those others bring AND they're not petty morons.
Anonymous wrote:There is ENVY in this thread. Don't worry about the other person - you'll be happy. Decide for yourself if the experience is worth the cost.
Anonymous wrote:So you don't go to restaurants that offer a senior citizen discount?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I agree with you. FA should be covered by annual giving and the auction. We shouldn't be required to cover it with our increased tuition. What that does is drive out the middle & upper middle classes bc tuition has now reached the point of being unaffordable for all most but the wealthy in order to subsidize those with low HHI.