Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We went with 36, now wish we went with 48.
So much space for activities.
Huh? What activities can you do with a 48" cooktop
sex
ouch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We went with 36, now wish we went with 48.
So much space for activities.
Huh? What activities can you do with a 48" cooktop
sex
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We went with 36, now wish we went with 48.
So much space for activities.
Huh? What activities can you do with a 48" cooktop
Anonymous wrote:We went with 36, now wish we went with 48.
So much space for activities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think a 30 vs 36 will be a problem for resale? House value is around 1.6 million.
At that price, definitely go with the 36". As long as you have sufficient counter top space, very few people will turn down your house because the range is larger. Plenty of people may look at it, though, and decide that it's too small and move on to another house (36" seems to be the minimum standard in that price range, from the few I've looked at recently), because who wants to do a kitchen remodel for a bigger range after spending $1.6 million for the house?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think a 30 vs 36 will be a problem for resale? House value is around 1.6 million.
Anonymous wrote:We do not have a million dollar house and our kitchen is not huge, but I cook almost exclusively on the range, not in the oven, and I love our 36" range. Last night, I had a large pot of water boiling for pasta, a grill pan with shrimp going, a small pine with toasted pine nuts and another pan with a concasse of tomatoes, all at once. Love it. Plus, we bought a relatively inexpensive 36" range.
the one person I know with the biggest, most beautiful stove (I think its a 48" wolf) never ever cooks. Ever. the only time it has been used in a year is when they hired a cook for a party.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:definitely get the 36"+ for that value house. have you thought about doing a cooktop (36") and then a wall oven undercounter (anywhere) that is 30"? I thought a 36" oven was a waste of space and heating energy so this is what we did.
Our house has this arrangement, installed by previous owners. As someone who cooks/bakes a lot, I wouldn't choose it; I love the large range and wish I had more space in the oven. It's also a pain to replace the separate pieces; it's much more custom work.
And if it's not already clear, I think you ABSOLUTELY should do the 36" range. It makes such a huge difference if you cook a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:definitely get the 36"+ for that value house. have you thought about doing a cooktop (36") and then a wall oven undercounter (anywhere) that is 30"? I thought a 36" oven was a waste of space and heating energy so this is what we did.
Our house has this arrangement, installed by previous owners. As someone who cooks/bakes a lot, I wouldn't choose it; I love the large range and wish I had more space in the oven. It's also a pain to replace the separate pieces; it's much more custom work.
And if it's not already clear, I think you ABSOLUTELY should do the 36" range. It makes such a huge difference if you cook a lot.
Anonymous wrote:definitely get the 36"+ for that value house. have you thought about doing a cooktop (36") and then a wall oven undercounter (anywhere) that is 30"? I thought a 36" oven was a waste of space and heating energy so this is what we did.