Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think OP is saying OP saw her(his?) own order delivered to another table, the other patron put their fingers in it/ate some before/as the the server realized the mistake. The server took back the plate from Diner-who-didnt-order-it and brought it to OP after Other Diner had already stuck their hands in it. Order should have been re-prepared for OP and the first order should have been tossed. Is that correct OP?
Yes, that is correct. The server claims that the portion that the first customer dipped their fingers in had been replaced in the kitchen which the OP (me) did not believe. I don't like to waste food, but I could not stomach this. I also really did not like that customer who decided to eat from the plate that she/they claimed was not their order as it was being removed. Tacky.
The caveat is that I have no clue what they do to my food in the kitchen even after I request that it be freshly prepared. I felt I needed to say something.
I would not have been able to eat anything else there. If the 'new' one had already been ready at the exact magical same time as he took the first one back to the kitchen, why would it not have been brought to your table already?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think OP is saying OP saw her(his?) own order delivered to another table, the other patron put their fingers in it/ate some before/as the the server realized the mistake. The server took back the plate from Diner-who-didnt-order-it and brought it to OP after Other Diner had already stuck their hands in it. Order should have been re-prepared for OP and the first order should have been tossed. Is that correct OP?
Yes, that is correct. The server claims that the portion that the first customer dipped their fingers in had been replaced in the kitchen which the OP (me) did not believe. I don't like to waste food, but I could not stomach this. I also really did not like that customer who decided to eat from the plate that she/they claimed was not their order as it was being removed. Tacky.
The caveat is that I have no clue what they do to my food in the kitchen even after I request that it be freshly prepared. I felt I needed to say something.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is saying OP saw her(his?) own order delivered to another table, the other patron put their fingers in it/ate some before/as the the server realized the mistake. The server took back the plate from Diner-who-didnt-order-it and brought it to OP after Other Diner had already stuck their hands in it. Order should have been re-prepared for OP and the first order should have been tossed. Is that correct OP?
Anonymous wrote:And in which case, you say to the waiter "Uh, sorry, but I think someone has eaten a bite from this plate. Could I please have a fresh order?"
Anonymous wrote:So here's my guess on the OP:
The waiter offered the plate to another person as OP's table or a neighboring table. That person rejected it, but grabbed a handful of the food before the waiter took it away. (OP is asking etiquette question #1 about someone else's behavior). As OP was watching this unfold, realized that the plate was his/hers. Watched waiter take the plate back to the kitchen, then come deliver it to OP, still missing the bite that the first diner snagged (etiquette question #2 is about his/her own reaction at that point).
If that's the situation:
1. No, if I'm rejecting a plate I won't eat off of it. I'm not paying for it, I don't get it.
2. Someone at my table, like DH? Ok. Some random diner, two tables over, had their fingers in my plate? Yuck, no.