Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give me an idea of what your child has in aap. I think my kids words seem beyond an 8 yr old's understanding...but maybe it's normal for aap.
Third grade wasn't too bad (is your kid in the Wordly Wise book? Caesar's English?). They're learning prefixes in my one kid's class. Sub --> substitute, subscribe, subterranean, etc. Or pre --> prepare, prescribe, etc.
Wait till 4th grade--my older kid was learning words I wasn't even sure of. I kept assuring him that if he learned these words, he'd crush the Verbal section of the SAT years from now.![]()
Your examples sound familiar -- but don't you think it a bit much to expect an 8 yr. old to understand and spell words like that? I mean, my kid can't even accurately pronounce many of the words (i.e. substitute) so it's unlikely he can spell words he can't properly pronounce. He has no basis in real life for knowing what a "subcommittee" is -- it just seems like these would be appropriate for older kids. Yes, I understand this is AAP, but I'm wondering if my kid is missing out on learning to spell and use words like "their" and "there" correctly... or how to spell "could" and "should." It's fine to be all "advanced" -- so long as they cover the normal 3rd grade words first, IMO. And I don't see them doing that. It's like week 5 or 6 of the school year and they are supposed to know "subcommittee"???? (BTW -- there isn't a book, just printouts -- so no Wordly Wise or Ceasar's English.) It all just makes me question the value/fit of AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Yet the majority of third grade AAP students are unable to use the proper there, their, they're.
Signed,
Third grade AAP teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry OP, my 3rd grader has the same words (they must be working out of the same program) and she knew all the words on the list. We were hoping the words would get more challenging.
Why should my child have to sit through their and there just because yours is not advanced? She spent 3 years prior at school waiting to be taught something new.
Did anyone find it ironic that this poster used the wrong form of "there?"