Anonymous wrote:Why do so many posters not name the schools that are applied to? Seems oddly secretive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are just so many seats and so, so many applicants. It's the numbers.Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone think it's harder to get into a top college when it's demonstrably easier?
http://youtu.be/le2dkeYnEzA
John Katzman's "hacking college admissions" explains why it is important to fall in love with more than one elite school.
It may be true that more kids will get into one of more colleges within a particular range that they are qualified for. But it is still harder to get into a particular college, I think, with people applying to so many more schools. Allowing kids to apply to 15-20 schools means that there is a lot of movement after acceptances come out. When kids get around to saying no to some schools, then the waitlist kicks in, and by that point disappointed students may have made other arrangements. The application frenzy also means kids don't carefully decide in advance what schools are really a good fit for them, and I believe many more kids end up transferring after their first year than they did in my day. DC reported that one classmate is applying to all of the "top 20" universities (assuming that means USNWR) indiscriminately. That just seems absurd. What am I missing here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are just so many seats and so, so many applicants. It's the numbers.Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone think it's harder to get into a top college when it's demonstrably easier?
http://youtu.be/le2dkeYnEzA
John Katzman's "hacking college admissions" explains why it is important to fall in love with more than one elite school.
It may be true that more kids will get into one of more colleges within a particular range that they are qualified for. But it is still harder to get into a particular college, I think, with people applying to so many more schools. Allowing kids to apply to 15-20 schools means that there is a lot of movement after acceptances come out. When kids get around to saying no to some schools, then the waitlist kicks in, and by that point disappointed students may have made other arrangements. The application frenzy also means kids don't carefully decide in advance what schools are really a good fit for them, and I believe many more kids end up transferring after their first year than they did in my day. DC reported that one classmate is applying to all of the "top 20" universities (assuming that means USNWR) indiscriminately. That just seems absurd. What am I missing here?
LOL!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are at least 6 different "early" admissions - EA, SCEA, REA, ED, ED1, and ED2. Each with different rules/requirements. Not all "Es" are the same.
Thanks, College Board.
Anonymous wrote:There are at least 6 different "early" admissions - EA, SCEA, REA, ED, ED1, and ED2. Each with different rules/requirements. Not all "Es" are the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are at least 6 different "early" admissions - EA, SCEA, REA, ED, ED1, and ED2. Each with different rules/requirements. Not all "Es" are the same.
Okay so change the post title to "Where is your DC applying Early". This argument about semantics is silly. If we have kids applying to college we don't need to be schooled in the definitions, we are all too familiar with them.
Mine applied last year to one Ivy ED and 2 EA schools. Deferred ED, one defer, one acceptance EA. We discussed whether it was a waste to use the ED on the Ivy because it was a stretch, but the other top choices only had EA or REA and none provided an admissions bump so it wasn't really wasted.
+1Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are at least 6 different "early" admissions - EA, SCEA, REA, ED, ED1, and ED2. Each with different rules/requirements. Not all "Es" are the same.
Okay so change the post title to "Where is your DC applying Early". This argument about semantics is silly. If we have kids applying to college we don't need to be schooled in the definitions, we are all too familiar with them.
Mine applied last year to one Ivy ED and 2 EA schools. Deferred ED, one defer, one acceptance EA. We discussed whether it was a waste to use the ED on the Ivy because it was a stretch, but the other top choices only had EA or REA and none provided an admissions bump so it wasn't really wasted.
Anonymous wrote:There are just so many seats and so, so many applicants. It's the numbers.Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone think it's harder to get into a top college when it's demonstrably easier?
http://youtu.be/le2dkeYnEzA
John Katzman's "hacking college admissions" explains why it is important to fall in love with more than one elite school.
Anonymous wrote:There are at least 6 different "early" admissions - EA, SCEA, REA, ED, ED1, and ED2. Each with different rules/requirements. Not all "Es" are the same.
Anonymous wrote:There are just so many seats and so, so many applicants. It's the numbers.Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone think it's harder to get into a top college when it's demonstrably easier?
http://youtu.be/le2dkeYnEzA
John Katzman's "hacking college admissions" explains why it is important to fall in love with more than one elite school.
There are just so many seats and so, so many applicants. It's the numbers.Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone think it's harder to get into a top college when it's demonstrably easier?
http://youtu.be/le2dkeYnEzA
John Katzman's "hacking college admissions" explains why it is important to fall in love with more than one elite school.