Anonymous wrote:I applaud Karen Garza for doing what her predecessor could not. Great decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the plan makes perfect sense. High school students have a much heavier work load than m.s. students, they play after school sports, join clubs, get jobs, etc. and need a little more sleep. M.S. children aren't as busy, and middle school is really a stepping stone for high school. I have both a H.S. child and a M.S. child and I am in full support of the changes.
Actually, middle school kids need more sleep than high school students.
Also, all of you justifications (heavier work load, significant after school activities, jobs) actually support early start times, not later. The time after school is far more valuable for all of those activities.
Can you cite the evidence please?
Plenty of evidence:
"Children aged five to 12 need 10-11 hours of sleep."
http://sleepfoundation.org/sleep-topics/children-and-sleep/page/0%2C2/
"School-aged children At least 10 hours a day" (note that the category "school aged children" includes many middle school students).
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/sdd/howmuch.html
So, if SLEEP is pushing for high school kids to get their utterly necessary recommended amount of sleep, then why aren't they pushing for middle school students to get that same recommended amount of sleep?
Can you smell the hypocrisy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the plan makes perfect sense. High school students have a much heavier work load than m.s. students, they play after school sports, join clubs, get jobs, etc. and need a little more sleep. M.S. children aren't as busy, and middle school is really a stepping stone for high school. I have both a H.S. child and a M.S. child and I am in full support of the changes.
Actually, middle school kids need more sleep than high school students.
Also, all of you justifications (heavier work load, significant after school activities, jobs) actually support early start times, not later. The time after school is far more valuable for all of those activities.
Can you cite the evidence please?
Anonymous wrote:7:30 is an improvement for our MS, so I'll take it. And living through our second year of hell of a 7:20 start, I absolutely would trade two years of 7:30 for four years at 8/8:15. Especially when, for most kids, those MS grades don't count.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the plan makes perfect sense. High school students have a much heavier work load than m.s. students, they play after school sports, join clubs, get jobs, etc. and need a little more sleep. M.S. children aren't as busy, and middle school is really a stepping stone for high school. I have both a H.S. child and a M.S. child and I am in full support of the changes.
Actually, middle school kids need more sleep than high school students.
Also, all of you justifications (heavier work load, significant after school activities, jobs) actually support early start times, not later. The time after school is far more valuable for all of those activities.
Anonymous wrote:I think the plan makes perfect sense. High school students have a much heavier work load than m.s. students, they play after school sports, join clubs, get jobs, etc. and need a little more sleep. M.S. children aren't as busy, and middle school is really a stepping stone for high school. I have both a H.S. child and a M.S. child and I am in full support of the changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:7:30 is an improvement for our MS, so I'll take it. And living through our second year of hell of a 7:20 start, I absolutely would trade two years of 7:30 for four years at 8/8:15. Especially when, for most kids, those MS grades don't count.
No doubt. I think OP is unaware that kids at the middle school part of secondary schools have been getting on a bus at 6:40 for years and years. This is a great improvement for them b/c being attached to a hs is actually resulting in a beneficial 8:00 start time.
Cry me a river, OP. (but, I do understand your angst since you've had it so good for so long).
Anonymous wrote:7:30 is an improvement for our MS, so I'll take it. And living through our second year of hell of a 7:20 start, I absolutely would trade two years of 7:30 for four years at 8/8:15. Especially when, for most kids, those MS grades don't count.
Anonymous wrote:PP again. Mine is the MS that starts at 7:20. Even without the after school program, school goes until 2:25 and buses don't leave the school until 2:35. Most kids aren't home before 3, many later. With the after school program, my MSer doesn't get home until 4:45 most days.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so tired of DCUMers always ignoring the fact that the middle schools inside the beltway start at 6th grade! My 11 year old 6th grader will not be ready to be home alone at 2-2:30!