Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can debate temping vs opks all day long, but the bottom line is you can't know for sure the timing of ovulation from either of those things. And temping is highly variable by the testing conditions.
That is why you don't just take your temp willy-nilly, any time of day. If you are consistent and take your temperature correctly if can be a quite accurate indicator of ovulation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your dates might be slightly off as implantation doesn't usually occur until 8dpo, but a line is a line--congrats.
Please stop with the misinformation, it is totally possible to get this line at 7 dpo.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. My first beta came back at 25. It was drawn on what I assumed to be 8dpo (I say assumed bc some posters say 7dpo was to early for a bfp). Too low to keep hope?

Anonymous wrote:You can debate temping vs opks all day long, but the bottom line is you can't know for sure the timing of ovulation from either of those things. And temping is highly variable by the testing conditions.
Anonymous wrote:Your dates might be slightly off as implantation doesn't usually occur until 8dpo, but a line is a line--congrats.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. You're definitely pregnant, but fertility friend can be wrong. Temping is NOT an accurate way to determine ovulation. The OPK pee sticks are more accurate, but even those can be off. It doesnt matter how many DPO you are, because you're pregnant, and if your beta doubles appropriately then that's what matters. you'll probably be able to tell by the beta what DPO you are, approx.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP again. So, I took a look at my "What to Expect" calendar and the predicted ovulation day was actually 2 days before Fertility Friend indicated that I ovulated. It also coincides with the CM I logged. That said, I think that I probably did ovulate 2 days earlier and my temps were a little delayed since I have low P to begin with. If that's the case then I would be 10dpo and the tests would make much more sense. I'm going to roll with that!
Anonymous wrote:I thought that hcg levels were determined by how long it's been since implantation, not ovulation. Is that incorrect?