Anonymous
09/04/2014 11:13
Subject: Did everyone land?
We were matched at a school for PK4 that we were happy to be matched at, though most of this board probably would not consider it. We declined spots at 2 other DCPS EotP and the charter we were at last year.
We did waste a couple of lottery slots on schools that were dreams, not real possibilities, but at the end of the day, we are happy and have not regretted our choice as they year begins.
We did waste a couple of lottery slots on schools that were dreams, not real possibilities, but at the end of the day, we are happy and have not regretted our choice as they year begins.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 11:08
Subject: Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:I think there's truth to two of the PPs - in the old system, one bad draw didn't knock you out of the game (that absolutely happened this time around with the unified lottery. My Kindergartener had numbers in the hundreds for each of her schools) so you had better odds taking individual chances at each school. BUT there really has been an explosion of people looking for spots so it's obvious that a greater number of people looking for a roughly similar number of spots (the opening of new schools isn't pacing growth) is going to cause headaches.
I'm not thrilled with where we landed but we'll see how it goes.
No, you didn't. It's painful how little DCUMers understand about statistics.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 11:07
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of a parent's comprehension of this issue is a much bigger indicator of success, or lack thereof, of a student than the elementary school they attend.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.
Awwww, look at you thinking you know something about statistics!
My thoughts exactly. PP doesn't seem to understand that no lottery procedure can change the number of desirable spots.
The lack of a parent's comprehension of this issue is a much bigger indicator of success, or lack thereof, of a student than the elementary school they attend.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 11:07
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:The lack of a parent's comprehension of this issue is a much bigger indicator of success, or lack thereof, of a student than the elementary school they attend.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.
Awwww, look at you thinking you know something about statistics!
My thoughts exactly. PP doesn't seem to understand that no lottery procedure can change the number of desirable spots.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 11:00
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
I thought Janney was able to accommodate all IB kids? Stoddert also was not.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:39
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
shinning stars has openings. families there love what happens the classroom. I'd try it instead of daycare.
Sela probably also has openings. I'd take either of those over my IB school.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:26
Subject: Did everyone land?
I think with the common lottery, many more people entered. I work with young children in Anacostia, and these parents almost never lotteried-- but this year they did. There were ad campaigns on buses, community organizations to help them apply, etc.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:25
Subject: Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Janney wasn't.
Nor was Lafayette.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:22
Subject: Did everyone land?
I think there's truth to two of the PPs - in the old system, one bad draw didn't knock you out of the game (that absolutely happened this time around with the unified lottery. My Kindergartener had numbers in the hundreds for each of her schools) so you had better odds taking individual chances at each school. BUT there really has been an explosion of people looking for spots so it's obvious that a greater number of people looking for a roughly similar number of spots (the opening of new schools isn't pacing growth) is going to cause headaches.
I'm not thrilled with where we landed but we'll see how it goes.
I'm not thrilled with where we landed but we'll see how it goes.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:06
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
shinning stars has openings. families there love what happens the classroom. I'd try it instead of daycare.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 10:01
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.
My child is in the same year as yours, and let me tell you, there are many, many more kids applying for these seats than there were when we applied three years ago. You are also saying that even though you were "successful" under the old system, you still had to play the lottery two more times to get something you are happy with (so far). The new system is designed to make winners happier from the get-go. It doesn't magically create more seats for increasing numbers of children. P.S. Bridges and some of the Appletrees are still going deep into their waitlists, so people should have gotten an offer somewhere if they played their lottery intelligently.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 09:53
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.
Awwww, look at you thinking you know something about statistics!
My thoughts exactly. PP doesn't seem to understand that no lottery procedure can change the number of desirable spots.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 09:48
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.
Awwww, look at you thinking you know something about statistics!
Anonymous
09/04/2014 08:37
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You didn't get in anywhere or anywhere acceptable to you?
Given that there are still open spots for PS3 and PK4 at some schools is must be the latter.
Anonymous
09/04/2014 08:37
Subject: Re:Did everyone land?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got nothing in the first round or the second round, so we're sticking with daycare for another year. Can't help but think that the previous system would have been better for us.
You clearly never went through the previous system.
BS. I went through the previous system and can tell you that EVERYONE I know got in somewhere they were happy with for PS3. EVERYONE. In fact most of us had multiple offers. Sure, we may have been less likely to get in at our number one pick, but we got multiple offers. This time around, if you got a bad draw in the lottery you were shut out of everywhere.
For us, it worked okay. For PS3 we had offers for Bridges, Appletree, DC Prep and a couple of others, as well as our inbound. For K we played again now with the common lottery and were shut out initially and hovered around the 50 percent mark on all the wait lists. Got in to our number 5 pick in May and happy there (so far). Still, for most people under the old system so long as you applied everywhere your chances of being shut out were minimal.