Anonymous wrote: Harvard's reputation -- especially internationally -- is secure from a broad reach over many years with a huge endowment. But that reach -- overseas and here -- is increasingly recognized as being a function of its graduate programs. Stanford -- like Yale and Princeton -- enjoys a stronger reputation as an undergraduate institution domestically. Overseas, I think that distinction is usually lost.
Anonymous wrote:And this nutty area.Anonymous wrote:This is really splitting hairs. Maybe more kids from DC want to go to Stanford to put a continent of distance between them and their nutty parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The big Taco Bell campus in Palo Alto didn't do it for me, but I'm sure the weather is nice.
+1
Didn't it start out as a junior college started by a railroad owner as the country was expanding Westward? Maybe that and the Mexican influence and climate are the reasons they chose that style of architecture.
Never was a junior college. The dude was a junior as in his dad was Leland Stanford senior.
I've always thought it funny that my diploma says "The Leland Stanford, Junior University". Certainly detracts a little from the prestige, lol. Have they changed them? And, to answer your question, no - Harvard still has too many years of history and name recognition to be overtaken by Stanford in the prestige game.
And this nutty area.Anonymous wrote:This is really splitting hairs. Maybe more kids from DC want to go to Stanford to put a continent of distance between them and their nutty parents.
Anonymous wrote:
It's an open secret that the top 3 universities keep their top rankings because US News makes it happen that way. It's a mutually beneficial agreement.
While you're pondering that, please also realize that US News boots out from the rankings any university that does not comply with its demand for info to fill in its criteria. Some (prestigious) universities have refused to play, claiming rankings are skewed too far towards certain non-academic criteria, and that the top spots are always reserved anyway.
Lastly, all participating universities end up fudging the numbers. All of them.
Anonymous wrote:It certainly seems like it. All the bright students I know want to go to Stanford. As for Harvard, not so much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]Has California dethroned New York as the most prestigious place to live and work? [/b] These questions are silly, it is simply a case of six of one, half dozen of the other, an apples-to-apples (or, more apropos of Stanford, oranges-to-oranges).
the trend post financial crisis has been yes. SF and DC are hotter cities for young grads IMO.
Anonymous[b wrote:]Has California dethroned New York as the most prestigious place to live and work? [/b] These questions are silly, it is simply a case of six of one, half dozen of the other, an apples-to-apples (or, more apropos of Stanford, oranges-to-oranges).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The big Taco Bell campus in Palo Alto didn't do it for me, but I'm sure the weather is nice.
+1
Didn't it start out as a junior college started by a railroad owner as the country was expanding Westward? Maybe that and the Mexican influence and climate are the reasons they chose that style of architecture.
Never was a junior college. The dude was a junior as in his dad was Leland Stanford senior.