Anonymous wrote:I have wondered about a similar question, b/c I have two Chinese-American daughters, but my DH and I are Caucasian. I have wondered, when we get to this point, if it would make a difference one way or another as to which "box" they check (say, on college applications) and, if so, which one would be "better."
Anonymous wrote:It's called integrity, OP. You don't go far in life without it.
If you are half Asian (as my kids are) you don't lie about it.
Anonymous wrote:For Ivy leagues, I heard it's better to omit the Asian part. Maybe it's not the same for half-Asian.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/12/19/fears-of-an-asian-quota-in-the-ivy-league/statistics-indicate-an-ivy-league-asian-quota
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure
None of them being an Asian qualifies them. They are all for disadvantaged/unrepresented minority. In the future, if they want to be in elected office or corporate board then being an Asian may qualify as unrepresented. But not for Ivy league schools.
No such thing as a disadvantaged minority anymore.
Why determines what the right representation is, how can any school legally target a quota ratio without discriminating?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure
None of them being an Asian qualifies them. They are all for disadvantaged/unrepresented minority. In the future, if they want to be in elected office or corporate board then being an Asian may qualify as unrepresented. But not for Ivy league schools.
No such thing as a disadvantaged minority anymore.
Why determines what the right representation is, how can any school legally target a quota ratio without discriminating?
Anonymous wrote:liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure
None of them being an Asian qualifies them. They are all for disadvantaged/unrepresented minority. In the future, if they want to be in elected office or corporate board then being an Asian may qualify as unrepresented. But not for Ivy league schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure
None of them being an Asian qualifies them. They are all for disadvantaged/unrepresented minority. In the future, if they want to be in elected office or corporate board then being an Asian may qualify as unrepresented. But not for Ivy league schools.
My DH got a minority scholarship to both undergrad and law school, and he's East Asian. They are not just for "disadvantaged" minorities (what does that mean, anyway? Being a minority in a majority white country is ALWAYS a disadvantage). Those scholarships are to increase diversity. My guess is that any school with significant Asian population (Berkeley, say) won't offer Asians a scholarship. But places trying to increase their diversity that don't have Asians will.
Anonymous wrote:liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure
None of them being an Asian qualifies them. They are all for disadvantaged/unrepresented minority. In the future, if they want to be in elected office or corporate board then being an Asian may qualify as unrepresented. But not for Ivy league schools.
Anonymous wrote:It's called integrity, OP. You don't go far in life without it.
Anonymous wrote:I have wondered about a similar question, b/c I have two Chinese-American daughters, but my DH and I are Caucasian. I have wondered, when we get to this point, if it would make a difference one way or another as to which "box" they check (say, on college applications) and, if so, which one would be "better."
liamw wrote:there are more minority only scholarships than white only that's fore sure