Anonymous wrote:And the charter school spin
http://www.dcpcsb.org/News-Room.aspx?ID=418
Where are the real numbers? Come on!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YAY - Seaton has a 16.6 percent increase in reading. Their reading scores last year were bad, but it's a great school. Glad that the scores have caught up and demonstrated a huge improvement (their math scores were already good).
Yes! I was happy to see that too.
Anonymous wrote:YAY - Seaton has a 16.6 percent increase in reading. Their reading scores last year were bad, but it's a great school. Glad that the scores have caught up and demonstrated a huge improvement (their math scores were already good).
Anonymous wrote: I'm also interested in whether Tyler Elementary School and Amidon-Bowen Elementary School improved significantly.
Anonymous wrote:Is there some supportable reason for DCPS to be using 2007 as the base year for this analysis? Because if you look at 2008-14, the picture is pretty different.
Anonymous wrote:Slightly more info here (DCPS only):
http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/DC%20CAS%202014%20-%20DCPS%20Press%20Deck.pdf
Slide 4 probably has the most disconcerting data.