Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is legal, but unethical.
"Unethical"? Really?
Yes, unethical.
It may not break Arlington law; it may not even break Virginia law: but it breaks God's law, and, more important, it violates Murphy's Law.
Ironic that you bring up allegedly illegal carpeting in the kitchen the day before we celebrate America's independence from England. A little known fact is that the reason for the Boston tea party which precipitated the war was people who were tired of tea stains on their kitchen carpeting. No tea, no stained carpet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is legal, but unethical.
"Unethical"? Really?
Yes, unethical.
It may not break Arlington law; it may not even break Virginia law: but it breaks God's law, and, more important, it violates Murphy's Law.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is legal, but unethical.
"Unethical"? Really?
Yes, unethical.
It may not break Arlington law; it may not even break Virginia law: but it breaks God's law, and, more important, it violates Murphy's Law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is legal, but unethical.
"Unethical"? Really?
Yes, unethical.
It may not break Arlington law; it may not even break Virginia law: but it breaks God's law, and, more important, it violates Murphy's Law.
Anonymous wrote:Yuck. I would worry that there is something wrong with the floor under the carpeting.