Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:James Madison has a lovely campus, especially the quad area.
The depressing town and the highway that divides it ruined it for our kids.
We loved the little town - very quaint with interesting shops and restaurants. And the highway does divide part of the campus, but most kids are over on the "main" side of campus anyway. We thought it was a beautiful campus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:James Madison has a lovely campus, especially the quad area.
The depressing town and the highway that divides it ruined it for our kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We loved Furman. Wish it were a more selective school.
I found it more "self-selecting." We would have been very satisfied if our kids had chosen to go to Furman.
+1
Well why are relatively few selecting it? It is a lovely campus near a cute town with a faculty respected for its focus on undergraduate teaching. But it's acceptance rate is over 75%. Other small schools with comparable SAT ranges have acceptance rates below 50%. DC really likes the school based on our visit, but we wonder what other people may know that we don't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We loved Furman. Wish it were a more selective school.
I found it more "self-selecting." We would have been very satisfied if our kids had chosen to go to Furman.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Syracuse. UConn.
Anonymous wrote:James Madison has a lovely campus, especially the quad area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks some of the campuses are going over the top? I recently returned to my Princeton reunion and was struck by how ritzy the whole place has become. It wasn't exactly rustic in my day, but the dorms, the new academic buildings, pretty much everything, was much fancier. I know I should have been impressed but I had the opposite reaction. Not one more dime will I contribute. They clearly don't need my (or anyone's) money.
Ah, but you probably still get burned in most dorms if you're taking a shower and someone flushes, and the food in Commons surely still leaves a lot to be desired. So there's that, even if the new academic buildings are nicer.
Anyway, to stay on topic, I recently saw the University of South Carolina for the first time, and it was much nicer than I had anticipated.
Anonymous wrote:Christopher Newport
It has a charming campus with all the modern conveniences.
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks some of the campuses are going over the top? I recently returned to my Princeton reunion and was struck by how ritzy the whole place has become. It wasn't exactly rustic in my day, but the dorms, the new academic buildings, pretty much everything, was much fancier. I know I should have been impressed but I had the opposite reaction. Not one more dime will I contribute. They clearly don't need my (or anyone's) money.