Anonymous wrote:Because honestly, the odds are at my age now, less than one percent and I can live with that.
I am forty-five now.
I got pregnant at this time last yr., but didn't fret over it because I assumed I would miscarry and I assumed right.
Even my friends and family were quite sure I wouldn't make it past week ten.
Sure it happens, but it is highly unlikely too.
It's more healthy to not take birth control at this stage of life than to take it because at this age, your body is getting old and the less you do to it the better.
Anonymous wrote:
Lots of lame reasons here.
Until you go through menopause, you can get pregnant!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
Not to mention that sex is waaaaay better without birth control pills or condoms. Everything works the way nature intended.
Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
It's not that OP isn't smart enough to understand the reasons, it's that there has been thread after thread these past few months of women in their 40s posting that they weren't using birth control and might be pregnant, don't want to be pregnant, aren't sure if they want to be pregnant, don't know what to do. Reading about women in their 40s who just neglected to use birth control and are now terminating a pregnancy because they didn't think they could get pregnant at 41 (42, 43, etc.) and already have enough kids is mind-boggling and irritating. I guess I expect better of women in this area.
To the PP who said it couldn't happen to her at 48 . . . yes, the chances are very slim but there was a long thread on pregnancies in the late 40s not that long ago. My own grandmother got pregnant naturally at 47 in what had to have been a one-shot deal.
I agree that it's weird that some women don't seem to realize that they can get pregnant in their early 40's.
I'm 48 and had my tubes tied so I think it's safe to take my chances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
It's not that OP isn't smart enough to understand the reasons, it's that there has been thread after thread these past few months of women in their 40s posting that they weren't using birth control and might be pregnant, don't want to be pregnant, aren't sure if they want to be pregnant, don't know what to do. Reading about women in their 40s who just neglected to use birth control and are now terminating a pregnancy because they didn't think they could get pregnant at 41 (42, 43, etc.) and already have enough kids is mind-boggling and irritating. I guess I expect better of women in this area.
To the PP who said it couldn't happen to her at 48 . . . yes, the chances are very slim but there was a long thread on pregnancies in the late 40s not that long ago. My own grandmother got pregnant naturally at 47 in what had to have been a one-shot deal.
I agree that it's weird that some women don't seem to realize that they can get pregnant in their early 40's.
I'm 48 and had my tubes tied so I think it's safe to take my chances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.
It's not that OP isn't smart enough to understand the reasons, it's that there has been thread after thread these past few months of women in their 40s posting that they weren't using birth control and might be pregnant, don't want to be pregnant, aren't sure if they want to be pregnant, don't know what to do. Reading about women in their 40s who just neglected to use birth control and are now terminating a pregnancy because they didn't think they could get pregnant at 41 (42, 43, etc.) and already have enough kids is mind-boggling and irritating. I guess I expect better of women in this area.
To the PP who said it couldn't happen to her at 48 . . . yes, the chances are very slim but there was a long thread on pregnancies in the late 40s not that long ago. My own grandmother got pregnant naturally at 47 in what had to have been a one-shot deal.
Anonymous wrote:
Because birth control is unpleasant and I'd rather take my extremely low chances of having another kid versus any kind of contraceptive.
Why aren't you smart enough to understand that we all have our reasons, OP?
Sillybilly.