Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not economically diverse, fool......this is gerrymandering. pure and simple
You're an idiot. These boundaries - specifically these schools included into Deal - were created decades ago because DCPS lost a historic lawsuit. Why? Basically because Deal was too white. Nothing is being gerrymandered now, this is the continuation of a historic pattern. You're a bitter, envious dipsh*t.
Next time, trying learning before you bloviate.
Anonymous wrote:Not economically diverse, fool......this is gerrymandering. pure and simple
Anonymous wrote:Not economically diverse, fool......this is gerrymandering. pure and simple
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shepherd already feeds Deal. Shepherd and Deal are both IB schools. Shepherd students attending Deal have had the right once enrolled in Deal to continue to Wilson (per DCPS). This doesn't represent a change. 9:59 is either being sarcastic or really doesn't know the demographics of Shepherd Park.
Bancroft already feeds Deal, too. It also feeds into Lincoln/CHEC, yet the overwhelming majority of 5th graders (or their parents) choose Deal. Even low income Latino parents know which is the better school.
We'll also have MacFarland as an option and if they can build a high quality program, Bancroft parents will come.
Anonymous wrote:The 16th Street Corridor should remain o the Deal boundary (thus making it Deal/Wilson) with Dual feeder rights to the new/unknown schools as they emerge.
This means 16th Street Heights AND Crestwood should be treated consistently and just like Mt Pleasant and Sheperd Park and Colonial Village be put back in the Deal boundary. To do any other way would is UNFAIR and UNJUST. Since Eaton, Woodley Park, Adams Morgan and SW DC all moved out of Deal/wilson there sure is room for the lwoest density neighborhoods 16th Street Heights and Crestwood.
Anonymous wrote:New poster. I agree Shepard and Bancroft should feed elsewhere. They do look to have gained a gerrymander via some political deal.
The only reason I can see that makes any sense is that DME looked at the available Deal/Wilson seats, decided she could fit in a few more kids, and that Shep/Bancroft just had the political pull (or got lucky) to be the ones selected.
But if there really are more available seats at Deal/Wilson, I think it makes more sense to put them into the openly available lottery rather than reserve them for Shep/Bancroft.
Does DME describe any justification anywhere for giving this special favor to Shep/Bancroft?
Anonymous wrote:The 16th Street Corridor should remain o the Deal boundary (thus making it Deal/Wilson) with Dual feeder rights to the new/unknown schools as they emerge.
This means 16th Street Heights AND Crestwood should be treated consistently and just like Mt Pleasant and Sheperd Park and Colonial Village be put back in the Deal boundary. To do any other way would is UNFAIR and UNJUST. Since Eaton, Woodley Park, Adams Morgan and SW DC all moved out of Deal/wilson there sure is room for the lwoest density neighborhoods 16th Street Heights and Crestwood.
Anonymous wrote:The 16th Street Corridor should remain o the Deal boundary (thus making it Deal/Wilson) with Dual feeder rights to the new/unknown schools as they emerge.
This means 16th Street Heights AND Crestwood should be treated consistently and just like Mt Pleasant and Sheperd Park and Colonial Village be put back in the Deal boundary. To do any other way would is UNFAIR and UNJUST. Since Eaton, Woodley Park, Adams Morgan and SW DC all moved out of Deal/wilson there sure is room for the lwoest density neighborhoods 16th Street Heights and Crestwood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New poster. I agree Shepard and Bancroft should feed elsewhere. They do look to have gained a gerrymander via some political deal.
The only reason I can see that makes any sense is that DME looked at the available Deal/Wilson seats, decided she could fit in a few more kids, and that Shep/Bancroft just had the political pull (or got lucky) to be the ones selected.
But if there really are more available seats at Deal/Wilson, I think it makes more sense to put them into the openly available lottery rather than reserve them for Shep/Bancroft.
Does DME describe any justification anywhere for giving this special favor to Shep/Bancroft?
It goes back for some decades. Even before a DME office was established. These schools will NEVER be zoned out of DEAL/Wilson regardless of the opposition.
Anonymous wrote:New poster. I agree Shepard and Bancroft should feed elsewhere. They do look to have gained a gerrymander via some political deal.
The only reason I can see that makes any sense is that DME looked at the available Deal/Wilson seats, decided she could fit in a few more kids, and that Shep/Bancroft just had the political pull (or got lucky) to be the ones selected.
But if there really are more available seats at Deal/Wilson, I think it makes more sense to put them into the openly available lottery rather than reserve them for Shep/Bancroft.
Does DME describe any justification anywhere for giving this special favor to Shep/Bancroft?