Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Agree. Actually, there have been many brusque, to the point posts (similar to the examples from the prescription post) that have woken me out of my over reactionary, making a bigger deal than necessary, state of mind
I gently suggest that if it takes "many" brusque posts for you to consider what someone has said, you have other issues. Personally, I have no problem with brusque/to the point posts. But we're not talking about those. We're discussing mean and rude posts. The examples listed abouve are rude. It communicates to me the responder isn't really interested in providing assistance, she's interested in snark. That's not been the way of the SN forum which is usually to provide assistance/insight/another POV, even if it's not what the OP wants to hear. That can all be done in a polite, civil manner. It would be a shame if the norms of the SN forum devolved to those of General Parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Agree. Actually, there have been many brusque, to the point posts (similar to the examples from the prescription post) that have woken me out of my over reactionary, making a bigger deal than necessary, state of mind
I gently suggest that if it takes "many" brusque posts for you to consider what someone has said, you have other issues. Personally, I have no problem with brusque/to the point posts. But we're not talking about those. We're discussing mean and rude posts. The examples listed abouve are rude. It communicates to me the responder isn't really interested in providing assistance, she's interested in snark. That's not been the way of the SN forum which is usually to provide assistance/insight/another POV, even if it's not what the OP wants to hear. That can all be done in a polite, civil manner. It would be a shame if the norms of the SN forum devolved to those of General Parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Agree. Actually, there have been many brusque, to the point posts (similar to the examples from the prescription post) that have woken me out of my over reactionary, making a bigger deal than necessary, state of mind
I gently suggest that if it takes "many" brusque posts for you to consider what someone has said, you have other issues. Personally, I have no problem with brusque/to the point posts. But we're not talking about those. We're discussing mean and rude posts. The examples listed abouve are rude. It communicates to me the responder isn't really interested in providing assistance, she's interested in snark. That's not been the way of the SN forum which is usually to provide assistance/insight/another POV, even if it's not what the OP wants to hear. That can all be done in a polite, civil manner. It would be a shame if the norms of the SN forum devolved to those of General Parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Agree. Actually, there have been many brusque, to the point posts (similar to the examples from the prescription post) that have woken me out of my over reactionary, making a bigger deal than necessary, state of mind
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Agree. Actually, there have been many brusque, to the point posts (similar to the examples from the prescription post) that have woken me out of my over reactionary, making a bigger deal than necessary, state of mind
). This forum got me through the process and IEP, suggested a developmental pediatrician and other therapists and evaluators/educational consultants, a godsend for a SN parent. I like people telling me "how they see it" b/c it's been very helpful.Anonymous wrote:I come here for information not civility. Frankly, I find the brusque and to the point posts with useful information much more helpful than the whining about how a post does not sound nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find that more posts don't respond to what the OP wrote/asked. that people with no experience with what the OP asked are responding or that they respond in an 'amped up' way (see http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/390999.page). I expect those kinds of repsonses in GP/OT but responses in the SN forum used to be more measured. The OP would still be told she was overreacting but in a more calm manner - the same manner I use with my kids. Being so reactive doesn't calm/defuse a situation and it seemed that approach used to be the norm of this forum. I miss it.
Those responses aren't bad at all
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of them were not nice, IMO...asking what they are doing. Oh probably tiptoeing around his triggers. Those are just the latest!
I agree that comment was snarky, a little mean, but probably true, sadly.
Having read every post in that thread, it's troubling that a mom whose kid is going to entering K is more concerned about coverage for the summer than the bigger picture. This kid has been kicked out of Easter Seals and turned down by Auburn. The parents need a long term plan to address the behavioral issues not just a plan to get through the summer.
Over the last several months there's a poster who tries to police the "niceness" of the forum and that's more annoying than the snark.[/quote]
+1000 Like they are the self-appointed hall monitor on an anon internet forum. Makes me![]()
Anonymous wrote:I find that more posts don't respond to what the OP wrote/asked. that people with no experience with what the OP asked are responding or that they respond in an 'amped up' way (see http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/390999.page). I expect those kinds of repsonses in GP/OT but responses in the SN forum used to be more measured. The OP would still be told she was overreacting but in a more calm manner - the same manner I use with my kids. Being so reactive doesn't calm/defuse a situation and it seemed that approach used to be the norm of this forum. I miss it.