Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you guys in dc?
In a DC, generally it's a Dickinsonian market, a tale of two cities. marginal neighborhoods with so-so schools have not recovered while desirable places for wealthy folks have far exceeded previous bubble. Exception to this is gentrifying places, but that's pretty transformative and hard to compare apples to apples.
I live in a marginal neighborhood with so-so (actually terrible) schools and prices are up probably 50 percent since 2006. My own house has increased in value about 300 percent since I bought it in 2003.
I'm guessing you are in DC itself? Large swaths are booming there, partly from the illusion that charters and lotteries have the capacity to absorb all the new families moving in to less desirable school districts. I fear there will be a tipping point where too many kids are vying for to few spots.
Also, you bought in 2003. You have some vague intuition of what the home was worth in 2006, but yu really don't know what you would have paid in 2005-2006. It's likely you would have had to pay far more than you think so you may not be as far above 2006 as you think.
Places which are struggling b/c of so-so schools locations: Alexandria FF, south falls church, pg county, prince william, Baltimore. Does that sound about right; they have not rebounded to bubble? But large the march of gentrification has swept further and further east in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you guys in dc?
In a DC, generally it's a Dickinsonian market, a tale of two cities. marginal neighborhoods with so-so schools have not recovered while desirable places for wealthy folks have far exceeded previous bubble. Exception to this is gentrifying places, but that's pretty transformative and hard to compare apples to apples.
I live in a marginal neighborhood with so-so (actually terrible) schools and prices are up probably 50 percent since 2006. My own house has increased in value about 300 percent since I bought it in 2003.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This conversation is useless without naming the locations.
+1. I'm dying to know where these houses are located!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is our situation as well. We ended up renting our former home but we lose money every month. We did not have the money to bring a check to the closing on that house and put a downpayment on our new house. So we are hoping prices will rise at least a little in the next few years!
Please folks don't hold onto to money losing rentals in the hopes prices will recover. Some would argue the current recovery is based on Fed stimulus. Yesterday we saw a -1% GDP, showing we still have problems beyond the Feds abilities. Another quarter like that, hello Recession. It's fine if you live there and are underwater. But pouring more money and taking risk prices could drop again? Please don't. Look at short sale please.
Anonymous wrote:This conversation is useless without naming the locations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you guys in dc?
In a DC, generally it's a Dickinsonian market, a tale of two cities. marginal neighborhoods with so-so schools have not recovered while desirable places for wealthy folks have far exceeded previous bubble. Exception to this is gentrifying places, but that's pretty transformative and hard to compare apples to apples.
Anonymous wrote:PP here with the money losing rental. We did look into short sale but it seemed you needed some kind of circumstance like losing a job or inability to make payments for the bank to work with you. Also, we can afford the payments although they are painful. Wouldnt a short sale destroy our credit? I am open to options!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you guys in dc?
In a DC, generally it's a Dickinsonian market, a tale of two cities. marginal neighborhoods with so-so schools have not recovered while desirable places for wealthy folks have far exceeded previous bubble. Exception to this is gentrifying places, but that's pretty transformative and hard to compare apples to apples.