
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't feel alone, it is like that for me too. When the teacher or I requests a simple meeting just to discuss dd's progress, every single time I go in, the counselor, reading specialist, and also the tutor who was a teacher at school was also there. We stopped using the tutor partly because we felt so ganged up on. We use an outside tutor now. We seem to have a good relationship at school, and I am just used to all these extra people at the meeting. Then it seems like they use up all the meeting time talking, and I have very little time to talk before the morning bell. It's very frustrating.
I'll say it again, this is an intimidation tactic. When they have more people at the meeting than you do, they get more time to speak and they have someone there who agrees with them and backs up their opinion. Even when there is no formal "vote," your view is out-voted. Unless there are specific reasons for each different school staffer to be at the meeting, you are being intimidated. They rely on the fact that you want a good relationship and don't want to complain. Don't play into this. Document it and complain about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Each time you meet, you can ask the surprise attendees, "Ms. XXX, I'm surprised to see you here. I wasn't informed that you would attend. Can you tell me why your presence is necessary at this meeting?" Also ask, "Do you regularly attend all teacher/parent meetings, or just those for 504 or IEP students?"
If there's no reasonable explanation and it's more than an isolated incident, write a letter afterwards complaining to the principal that this is an intimidation tactic to keep you from working collaboratively with the teacher about your student's needs. It's also discriminatory in the sense that it places unreasonable increased burdens on the parents of kids with IEPs or 504s. It could also be perceived as retaliatory if you have made complaints before.
Copy the special education supervisor or the 504 supervisor in the central administration. They hate to receive complaints that lay a paper trail for retaliation or systematic discouragement of parent participation.
NP here. It is behavior like this that makes teachers guarded.
Sorry, but the teachers were guarded before this behavior -- that's why they showed up with an excessive amount of people at the meeting. Don't blame the parent for the school's bad behavior.
If there is a real reason for multiple staffers to be present -- that's OK -- but if not, they are just trying to intimidate the parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Each time you meet, you can ask the surprise attendees, "Ms. XXX, I'm surprised to see you here. I wasn't informed that you would attend. Can you tell me why your presence is necessary at this meeting?" Also ask, "Do you regularly attend all teacher/parent meetings, or just those for 504 or IEP students?"
If there's no reasonable explanation and it's more than an isolated incident, write a letter afterwards complaining to the principal that this is an intimidation tactic to keep you from working collaboratively with the teacher about your student's needs. It's also discriminatory in the sense that it places unreasonable increased burdens on the parents of kids with IEPs or 504s. It could also be perceived as retaliatory if you have made complaints before.
Copy the special education supervisor or the 504 supervisor in the central administration. They hate to receive complaints that lay a paper trail for retaliation or systematic discouragement of parent participation.
NP here. It is behavior like this that makes teachers guarded.
Anonymous wrote:Don't feel alone, it is like that for me too. When the teacher or I requests a simple meeting just to discuss dd's progress, every single time I go in, the counselor, reading specialist, and also the tutor who was a teacher at school was also there. We stopped using the tutor partly because we felt so ganged up on. We use an outside tutor now. We seem to have a good relationship at school, and I am just used to all these extra people at the meeting. Then it seems like they use up all the meeting time talking, and I have very little time to talk before the morning bell. It's very frustrating.
Anonymous wrote:Each time you meet, you can ask the surprise attendees, "Ms. XXX, I'm surprised to see you here. I wasn't informed that you would attend. Can you tell me why your presence is necessary at this meeting?" Also ask, "Do you regularly attend all teacher/parent meetings, or just those for 504 or IEP students?"
If there's no reasonable explanation and it's more than an isolated incident, write a letter afterwards complaining to the principal that this is an intimidation tactic to keep you from working collaboratively with the teacher about your student's needs. It's also discriminatory in the sense that it places unreasonable increased burdens on the parents of kids with IEPs or 504s. It could also be perceived as retaliatory if you have made complaints before.
Copy the special education supervisor or the 504 supervisor in the central administration. They hate to receive complaints that lay a paper trail for retaliation or systematic discouragement of parent participation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you turn your attitude on its head? Instead of being embarrassed/ashamed/frustrated by having all of your kid's professionals at a meeting, you could chose to be grateful that the whole team is there and working to make sure everyone is on the same page.
What did you hope to get out of that meeting that you couldn't get because the other team members were there? Did you have an agenda that you couldn't address with the other professionals there?
Your team sounds very professional and kind to me.
OP here- I WANT to feel this way! I am so thankful for all of the hard work they do with my child, but they were so guarded yesterday and it doesn't expalin why it takes two people to call me. As I said earlier, I know I am just venting. This is not a big deal, but at the same time I don't want to feel uncomfortable with every meeting for the next 5 years. I will try to be more positive about it and think they did it for good reasons and not because of a bad reason- thanks for the reminder!