Anonymous wrote:Haha. "Management change" is one way to put it. The president appointed a new comptroller that has a completely different view of regulation, arguably or the better. All the rats from the old regime went scurrying to Promontory (e.g. Julie Williams)
Anonymous wrote:For a long time, the OCC was the personal concierge to the banks. After a management change 2-3 years ago they are less of a banking lapdog, but are finding it hard to adapt to the new world.
Anonymous wrote:For a long time, the OCC was the personal concierge to the banks. After a management change 2-3 years ago they are less of a banking lapdog, but are finding it hard to adapt to the new world.
Anonymous wrote:Managers who wreak havoc on the employees there -they exist! Overpaid managers who are users...
Anonymous wrote:Hmm. . . hard to see what is so "insane" about the OCC. Certainly the pace of work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you apply to the FED yet?Been there done that (OCC)
On my way to the door here. Lol.
I have passed the first round of interviews. How does the Fed set new employees' salaries? I believe I am now underpaid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you apply to the FED yet?Been there done that (OCC)
On my way to the door here. Lol.
I have passed the first round of interviews. How does the Fed set new employees' salaries? I believe I am now underpaid.
Anonymous wrote:Did you apply to the FED yet?Been there done that (OCC)
Anonymous wrote:I interviewed at OCC once out of grad school for an econ position and it was not that fun.
As for the Fed - the SF one seems the most fun.