Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I don't know enough about how this works, but how many private schools don't receive federal funding? As long as they don't, they don't have to comply with Title IX, right? Which means there's not any investigation into those schools? Which means that randon list of 55 universities which people would never send their daughters to, will just have to blindly hope that those schools somehow manage to properly handle all sexual assaults?
To my knowledge there are NO private nonprofit schools that don't receive federal funding. Perhaps some of the for-profits (University of Phoenix, etc) do not.
Federal funding in this context refers to students of the school receiving federally subsidized loans and Pell grants. I don't know any colleges where students aren't eligible to receive these.
Patrick Henry in Purcellville does not receive federal funding.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, but those of you who think this list means anything or would base your college decisions on it are terribly misguided. This is simply a list of institutions against which an OCR complaint is currently pending. That just means a student is unhappy with the results of the school's internal response to her complaint. It doesn't mean there is systemic harassment of women at the school, and it doesn't mean that the school's anti-harassment procedures are necessarily deficient or were even deficient in that student's case. It just means OCR is currently investigating. OCR is a highly political organization, and the only conceivable reason for publishing this "list" is to pressure all institutions of higher education to adopt whatever anti-harassment enforcement mechanisms the current OCR thinks are desirable, and to get voters who don't think critically to believe that the Obama administration "fights for women." OCR is very open that it would hold schools accountable for student on student misconduct well beyond what current law requires. You should think hard about how much a university really can or should do about private conduct between two young adults, particularly when alcohol is involved, and it is a matter of he said, she said. Of course there are the easy cases where the football team gang rapes an unconscious girl, but most cases are not so cut and dry.
Anonymous wrote:This is only what was reported. Additionally, some women don't report assaults so I'm sure this list, at a minimum, should probably be much longer.Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/list-of-55-colleges-universities-under-title-ix-investigations-over-handling-of-sexual-violence/2014/05/01/9de0c5dc-d15a-11e3-a6b1-45c4dffb85a6_story.html
Is your school on the list? Lot of popular DCUM-approved schools on there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I don't know enough about how this works, but how many private schools don't receive federal funding? As long as they don't, they don't have to comply with Title IX, right? Which means there's not any investigation into those schools? Which means that randon list of 55 universities which people would never send their daughters to, will just have to blindly hope that those schools somehow manage to properly handle all sexual assaults?
To my knowledge there are NO private nonprofit schools that don't receive federal funding. Perhaps some of the for-profits (University of Phoenix, etc) do not.
Federal funding in this context refers to students of the school receiving federally subsidized loans and Pell grants. I don't know any colleges where students aren't eligible to receive these.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not reported assaults, it's possible Title IX violations stemming from the investigation of assaults. But DOE won't say what those violations are. Are they as serious as coverups, or is it a case where a student has reported a sexual assault to a staff person with obligatory reporting responsibilities, but asked the school not to investigate, and the school has heeded the student's wishes instead of following the law?
I think it's a pretty sleazy move to release this list to publicly shame those 55 universities, without giving us enough information to make any sort of judgement.
I disagree. This is great.
Anonymous wrote:My DC will be attending a school on this list next year, and is waitlisted at 2 more schools on the list. I went to one of the highest profile offenders (at least news wise). My DD goes to one NOT on the list. I think this is an issue at most colleges frankly. I'm glad this issue is coming to the forefront and that colleges are starting to address this much more seriously. But really, not being on this list gives me no confidence whatsoever that the school is handling things any differently than those who are on the list.
