cmgiven wrote:Another opportunity for those who can't make it (or even those who can), is to use Code for DC's OurDCschools.org app. One advantage to providing feedback about changes this way is that your responses will be shared, verbatim, back with the community for use in advocating for/against proposals.
The data will be anonymized to protect your privacy.
Disclaimer: I built the thing.
Anonymous wrote:Yes a significant portion of the city does not view the choice sets as a better option. I am in Ward 5 and deeply ambivalent about them. If it included participation of local charters or maybe increased the number of local parents to use the neighborhood schools it would be to my benefit. One thing all of the DCUM protesters should consider to the extent you oppose because it is all about me and mine, you may be undermining your position. I get the question many raise is how do we make schools better so others want to use those schools, but keep in mind that is not under the DME's mandate. She has to propose something. Realistically, what needs to be proposed are quality trigger points, and what that would look like for shifting student populations.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:They are definitely presenting the same proposals. You won't see new proposals until late May or early June.
Apparently 450 people participated in the last round. Do they think they'll see a lot of new faces this time around? I don't understand the purpose or the thinking here...or why DCPS is completely tacit w/DMEforDC.
Anonymous wrote:For anyone like me who cannot attend the meetings, please drop an email to the DME with your thoughts. They claim to be counting all these views, so please get your "vote" in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, definitely do not refer to high performing "seats"
Do insist that the DME explain how they plan to "grow the pie"
Maybe a reference to HRCS could be worked in . . .
what's HRCS?