Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is awful.
It should have been divided up among the siblings with portions of their inheritance parceled out to the grand kids in trust with each grandchild getting an equal amount.
Example:
Two kids
One has one kid
One has two
Estate is a million dollars
First kid gets 400,000 and his kid gets 100,000
Second kid gets 300,000 and each of his kids gets 100,000
Someone will complain. Doesn't matter how its set up.
I agree. I think it is better to divide among first generation equally. But if person is insistent on leaving to grand kids as well this way is better. People shouldn't get more money just because they have more kids.
In the example, the person with more kids gets LESS money - $300,000. Assuming there is a trust and the person has no access to the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is awful.
It should have been divided up among the siblings with portions of their inheritance parceled out to the grand kids in trust with each grandchild getting an equal amount.
Example:
Two kids
One has one kid
One has two
Estate is a million dollars
First kid gets 400,000 and his kid gets 100,000
Second kid gets 300,000 and each of his kids gets 100,000
Someone will complain. Doesn't matter how its set up.
I agree. I think it is better to divide among first generation equally. But if person is insistent on leaving to grand kids as well this way is better. People shouldn't get more money just because they have more kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is awful.
It should have been divided up among the siblings with portions of their inheritance parceled out to the grand kids in trust with each grandchild getting an equal amount.
Example:
Two kids
One has one kid
One has two
Estate is a million dollars
First kid gets 400,000 and his kid gets 100,000
Second kid gets 300,000 and each of his kids gets 100,000
Someone will complain. Doesn't matter how its set up.
I agree. I think it is better to divide among first generation equally. But if person is insistent on leaving to grand kids as well this way is better. People shouldn't get more money just because they have more kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is awful.
It should have been divided up among the siblings with portions of their inheritance parceled out to the grand kids in trust with each grandchild getting an equal amount.
Example:
Two kids
One has one kid
One has two
Estate is a million dollars
First kid gets 400,000 and his kid gets 100,000
Second kid gets 300,000 and each of his kids gets 100,000
Someone will complain. Doesn't matter how its set up.
Anonymous wrote:"It's not like your brothers spent money left to their kids; it was money left to pay for their kids' college educations. In other words, it was to help THEM take care of their financial responsibility to pay for their children's education. See the difference? "
No.
Anonymous wrote:That is awful.
It should have been divided up among the siblings with portions of their inheritance parceled out to the grand kids in trust with each grandchild getting an equal amount.
Example:
Two kids
One has one kid
One has two
Estate is a million dollars
First kid gets 400,000 and his kid gets 100,000
Second kid gets 300,000 and each of his kids gets 100,000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What they did is felony theft. It's criminal.
OP, if the estate is still open, I would talk to the probate judge about it. He can order the parents to place the money due the children into secure accounts.
If the money is gone, I would pull your nieces and nephews aside when they reach their 17th or 18th birthday, advise them that their parents stole their inheritance, and advise them to see an attorney. The parents can pay for college or pay the kids back. The statute of limitations for suing the parents for the return of the money will start running when the kids turn 18, though. They will only have a short time after their 18th birthday to decide what to do.
+1000 on all of the above, but wanted to highlight the criminal aspect.
Your brothers are HORRIBLE people. This, to me, is unforgivable. Truly, the type of action that would make me turn my back on them forever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What they did is felony theft. It's criminal.
OP, if the estate is still open, I would talk to the probate judge about it. He can order the parents to place the money due the children into secure accounts.
If the money is gone, I would pull your nieces and nephews aside when they reach their 17th or 18th birthday, advise them that their parents stole their inheritance, and advise them to see an attorney. The parents can pay for college or pay the kids back. The statute of limitations for suing the parents for the return of the money will start running when the kids turn 18, though. They will only have a short time after their 18th birthday to decide what to do.
+1000 on all of the above, but wanted to highlight the criminal aspect.
Your brothers are HORRIBLE people. This, to me, is unforgivable. Truly, the type of action that would make me turn my back on them forever.
You both are nuts.
Op stated the will left the money to the grandkids. If the grandkids are minor children, the money goes to their parent/legal guardian unless the will had specified some other method - held in trust, etc .
Presumably the child whose parents purchased the house will live in the house and perhaps a nicer house than they would have if they had not received the inheritance and reap the benefit of possibly their parents have more disposable income to spend on the child since they have reduced their housing costs. The child whose family started a business will be provided for by the income that business generates.
OP being upset by how her siblings choose to spend this inheritance is as silly as her brother being upset how this dad choose to donate his own money.