Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There isn't anything new here except more applications, lower admit rates, more schools in the single digit zone. Not a great article. No analysis of legacy trends or foreign student applications and admits.
It's news to plenty of people. For example, someone in their 40s might have read that Yale has a 6% acceptance rate but not have realized that the rate was 20%+ when they applied in the 1980s. The historical overview, even in summary fashion, is helpful to put this issue in perspective.
Right. There are plenty of Ivy grads who might not make the cut today, but are wholly unaware of how the odds have changed over a generation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure if I am articulating my question clearly, so please humor me, but if you account for all of the extra "randomly fired off" applications that do not fall within the Ivy's selection profile, then is the selectivity still dramatically different than it was 20 years ago? In the 80's was the applicant pool largely comprised of qualified students? I guess that I am curious about the acceptance rate for applicants that mirror the profile of the current freshman class.
I think I understand. You're asking whether the accepted student profile has gotten measurably stronger, I think. In other words, would a student admitted in the 1980s (30-35 years ago!) still be admitted today? It's a hard question, but I think the best way to answer might be to look at the average SAT scores for admitted students. Have they changed significantly. or are they still roughly the same? That's not a perfect answer, but it might give a good estimate.
Anonymous wrote:Another aspect: Foreign students are often wealthy and pay full tuition. Schools know that. Admissions for foreign students are not need blind.
It's troubling ... why should tax exempt institutions short-change the offspring of taxpaying citizens? (I probably sound like a lunatic right winger. I'm the opposite of that!)
21:01 Everyone I know who went to highly selective schools in the 80s knows the acceptance rates were might higher.[/quote
Having just been through the college applications process with a DC who wanted engineering, they were rejected from many schools that naviance claimed they would have no trouble getting into. Very distressing for DC.
The other point the article did little to expand was the huge marketing programs that many of the these schools do to get kids to apply thinking they have a chance. The schools are spending money so they can get their acceptance rates down and look more prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:Those Yale numbers (public, private, legacy) exceed 100%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure if I am articulating my question clearly, so please humor me, but if you account for all of the extra "randomly fired off" applications that do not fall within the Ivy's selection profile, then is the selectivity still dramatically different than it was 20 years ago? In the 80's was the applicant pool largely comprised of qualified students? I guess that I am curious about the acceptance rate for applicants that mirror the profile of the current freshman class.
I think I understand. You're asking whether the accepted student profile has gotten measurably stronger, I think. In other words, would a student admitted in the 1980s (30-35 years ago!) still be admitted today? It's a hard question, but I think the best way to answer might be to look at the average SAT scores for admitted students. Have they changed significantly. or are they still roughly the same? That's not a perfect answer, but it might give a good estimate.
Anonymous wrote:Yale has good statistics. Int'l students have risen from 3-4% in 1990 to 11% in 2014. But increases the difficulty for other applicants by 7-8%, that's not nearly as big a deal as these articles make it out to be. I really think lots of this "new" selectivity has to do with simply more applications from the same batch of students.
file:///C:/Users/Brent/Desktop/B5_Intl_Student_Enrollment_1987_1999.pdf
http://oir.yale.edu/sites/default/files/FACTSHEET(2013-14).pdf
http://oir.yale.edu/1976-2000-yale-book-numbers
Anonymous wrote:Those Yale numbers (public, private, legacy) exceed 100%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure if I am articulating my question clearly, so please humor me, but if you account for all of the extra "randomly fired off" applications that do not fall within the Ivy's selection profile, then is the selectivity still dramatically different than it was 20 years ago? In the 80's was the applicant pool largely comprised of qualified students? I guess that I am curious about the acceptance rate for applicants that mirror the profile of the current freshman class.
I think I understand. You're asking whether the accepted student profile has gotten measurably stronger, I think. In other words, would a student admitted in the 1980s (30-35 years ago!) still be admitted today? It's a hard question, but I think the best way to answer might be to look at the average SAT scores for admitted students. Have they changed significantly. or are they still roughly the same? That's not a perfect answer, but it might give a good estimate.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure if I am articulating my question clearly, so please humor me, but if you account for all of the extra "randomly fired off" applications that do not fall within the Ivy's selection profile, then is the selectivity still dramatically different than it was 20 years ago? In the 80's was the applicant pool largely comprised of qualified students? I guess that I am curious about the acceptance rate for applicants that mirror the profile of the current freshman class.