Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I'm shocked to know that federal employees don't consider cheating on their time cards to be stealing -- because as a tax payer I certainly do!!!! You all who are claiming OP should MYOB are part of the problem. I hate that people say to look the other way when someone cheats or steals. This is not an MYOB situation -- it's stealing our money, pure and simple.
OP, I would make an anonymous complaint. This guy is a thief. FYI -- my former bosses did this routinely. I know because I was in charge of time sheets. One would come in half an hour before everyone else, leave earlier than everyone else, take a half day every friday and every friday off as "flex pay." Scam. Other one would come in at 4:45 in the afternoon and claim an entire day. It's sickening. Hard to respect people like this. Please report them, OP -- we as taxpayers need to get rid of these cheats.
Do you understand how work works? I couldn't care less if some bureaucrat is sitting behind their desk for 8 hours staring out of a window, or for 2 hours. The taxpayer is ripped off to the extent to which they are not doing their job, not based on whether or not they are in a building at a particular time. What matters is whether the service is being performed as specified.
So if you're done after two hours it's okay to go home? No, it's not. My bosses were ripping off the system -- and OF COURSE they were all over my hours, the one who took the "flex schedule" in particular. What a hypocrite. He was completely aware of the hours that were supposed to be worked in a two week period; it was much on his mind, because he was a cheater himself. Like I said, hard to respect people like that. I would certainly not protect them willingly. I never turned either of them in but I wish I had.
If you are done after two hours then there is a problem with the amount of work you are being assigned. If someone does their work in two hours and then sits there doing nothing for 6 hours, then how is that any better than doing their work in two hours and then leaving? the net result is identical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they paid by the hour? If they are salaried who cares. If they are not doing their job, they should be managed out, whether they spend 5 hours a week in the office or 100.
+1
The quality of the work product matters -- not just the 8-9 hrs a day in the office. Those days are behind us, thankfully.
Not in my fed office. We have to be able to prove, through the time logs, that we were in the office for 80 hours in a pay period. It's archaic, yes, but those who lie about it are potentially subjecting to disciplinary action not only themselves but also the timekeeper and supervisor who have to vouch for and sign the payroll reports. But still, I say OP should MYOB and let the correct person deal with it.
How is the correct person supposed to deal with it if they don't know? If you look the other way, you are complicit.
Who says they don't know? You cannot presume to know the arrangement that every employee has with their supervisor. I was speaking in general terms in my post above; I've seen employees who were allowed to work all kinds of special schedules due to circumstance.
Yes, but not clocking out is not a special schedule -- it's cheating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I'm shocked to know that federal employees don't consider cheating on their time cards to be stealing -- because as a tax payer I certainly do!!!! You all who are claiming OP should MYOB are part of the problem. I hate that people say to look the other way when someone cheats or steals. This is not an MYOB situation -- it's stealing our money, pure and simple.
OP, I would make an anonymous complaint. This guy is a thief. FYI -- my former bosses did this routinely. I know because I was in charge of time sheets. One would come in half an hour before everyone else, leave earlier than everyone else, take a half day every friday and every friday off as "flex pay." Scam. Other one would come in at 4:45 in the afternoon and claim an entire day. It's sickening. Hard to respect people like this. Please report them, OP -- we as taxpayers need to get rid of these cheats.
Do you understand how work works? I couldn't care less if some bureaucrat is sitting behind their desk for 8 hours staring out of a window, or for 2 hours. The taxpayer is ripped off to the extent to which they are not doing their job, not based on whether or not they are in a building at a particular time. What matters is whether the service is being performed as specified.
So if you're done after two hours it's okay to go home? No, it's not. My bosses were ripping off the system -- and OF COURSE they were all over my hours, the one who took the "flex schedule" in particular. What a hypocrite. He was completely aware of the hours that were supposed to be worked in a two week period; it was much on his mind, because he was a cheater himself. Like I said, hard to respect people like that. I would certainly not protect them willingly. I never turned either of them in but I wish I had.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I'm shocked to know that federal employees don't consider cheating on their time cards to be stealing -- because as a tax payer I certainly do!!!! You all who are claiming OP should MYOB are part of the problem. I hate that people say to look the other way when someone cheats or steals. This is not an MYOB situation -- it's stealing our money, pure and simple.
OP, I would make an anonymous complaint. This guy is a thief. FYI -- my former bosses did this routinely. I know because I was in charge of time sheets. One would come in half an hour before everyone else, leave earlier than everyone else, take a half day every friday and every friday off as "flex pay." Scam. Other one would come in at 4:45 in the afternoon and claim an entire day. It's sickening. Hard to respect people like this. Please report them, OP -- we as taxpayers need to get rid of these cheats.
Do you understand how work works? I couldn't care less if some bureaucrat is sitting behind their desk for 8 hours staring out of a window, or for 2 hours. The taxpayer is ripped off to the extent to which they are not doing their job, not based on whether or not they are in a building at a particular time. What matters is whether the service is being performed as specified.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, I'm shocked to know that federal employees don't consider cheating on their time cards to be stealing -- because as a tax payer I certainly do!!!! You all who are claiming OP should MYOB are part of the problem. I hate that people say to look the other way when someone cheats or steals. This is not an MYOB situation -- it's stealing our money, pure and simple.
OP, I would make an anonymous complaint. This guy is a thief. FYI -- my former bosses did this routinely. I know because I was in charge of time sheets. One would come in half an hour before everyone else, leave earlier than everyone else, take a half day every friday and every friday off as "flex pay." Scam. Other one would come in at 4:45 in the afternoon and claim an entire day. It's sickening. Hard to respect people like this. Please report them, OP -- we as taxpayers need to get rid of these cheats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they paid by the hour? If they are salaried who cares. If they are not doing their job, they should be managed out, whether they spend 5 hours a week in the office or 100.
+1
The quality of the work product matters -- not just the 8-9 hrs a day in the office. Those days are behind us, thankfully.
Not in my fed office. We have to be able to prove, through the time logs, that we were in the office for 80 hours in a pay period. It's archaic, yes, but those who lie about it are potentially subjecting to disciplinary action not only themselves but also the timekeeper and supervisor who have to vouch for and sign the payroll reports. But still, I say OP should MYOB and let the correct person deal with it.
How is the correct person supposed to deal with it if they don't know? If you look the other way, you are complicit.
Who says they don't know? You cannot presume to know the arrangement that every employee has with their supervisor. I was speaking in general terms in my post above; I've seen employees who were allowed to work all kinds of special schedules due to circumstance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they paid by the hour? If they are salaried who cares. If they are not doing their job, they should be managed out, whether they spend 5 hours a week in the office or 100.
+1
The quality of the work product matters -- not just the 8-9 hrs a day in the office. Those days are behind us, thankfully.
Not in my fed office. We have to be able to prove, through the time logs, that we were in the office for 80 hours in a pay period. It's archaic, yes, but those who lie about it are potentially subjecting to disciplinary action not only themselves but also the timekeeper and supervisor who have to vouch for and sign the payroll reports. But still, I say OP should MYOB and let the correct person deal with it.
How is the correct person supposed to deal with it if they don't know? If you look the other way, you are complicit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they paid by the hour? If they are salaried who cares. If they are not doing their job, they should be managed out, whether they spend 5 hours a week in the office or 100.
+1
The quality of the work product matters -- not just the 8-9 hrs a day in the office. Those days are behind us, thankfully.
Not in my fed office. We have to be able to prove, through the time logs, that we were in the office for 80 hours in a pay period. It's archaic, yes, but those who lie about it are potentially subjecting to disciplinary action not only themselves but also the timekeeper and supervisor who have to vouch for and sign the payroll reports. But still, I say OP should MYOB and let the correct person deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are they paid by the hour? If they are salaried who cares. If they are not doing their job, they should be managed out, whether they spend 5 hours a week in the office or 100.
+1
The quality of the work product matters -- not just the 8-9 hrs a day in the office. Those days are behind us, thankfully.