Anonymous wrote:Lord of the Rings was painful to read
Anonymous wrote:Basically any poetry. I just get tired.
Anonymous wrote:A Tale of Two Cities. Absolutely, positively could not get into this book no matter how hard I tried. So incredibly dull.
Anonymous wrote:You've heard of things referred to as "Orwellian," haven't you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In this PC world we live in, rife with euphemisms, you can't see the value in the concepts in 1984?? Doublespeak? 2minutes hate?
I'm the first person who didn't like 1984. (not the one who called in simplistic). I do see the value in it, but the bleakness of the book was just overwhelming. Big brother might be watching us right now - every keystroke - but like is pretty damn good, you know? Or maybe I am a fool for accepting this level of government intrusion in our lives. But life is still good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1984
For years I heard it proclaimed as great literature and something that will really make you think.
No way. It's an ok story but the themes and concepts are so simple.
It was published in 1949 and sparked the whole idea of Big Brother is watching you. You've heard of things referred to as "Orwellian," haven't you? Pretty impressive for something so simple.
Anonymous wrote:In this PC world we live in, rife with euphemisms, you can't see the value in the concepts in 1984?? Doublespeak? 2minutes hate?