Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if they were, what if only the white boys were allow to play presidents? That's historically accurate as well.
Meh. Race is a bit of a construct. If you go to a world class opera you will see parts being played by people of historically inaccurate races, and no one makes a fuss.
I am female. When I was in fifth grade and doing a history project, I dressed up as Jacques Cousteau. It was a hit.
Anonymous wrote:Even if they were, what if only the white boys were allow to play presidents? That's historically accurate as well.
Anonymous wrote:Were the boys each representing a past president? If so, then it's accurate.
Maybe they talked about that in class and have already talked about how life is different now.
Sometimes, reenacting the past can be a powerful tool to show how things have changed or should change.
If you have questions, talk to the teacher. But do it in a way that is respectful, and shows that you want to understand. Not just say that there should be girls in the president group. All us girls would like to have a real girl in the real president group, but the fact is - it hasn't happened yet. Maybe that's what the teacher wants the kids to think about.
There may be a lot more to the entire unit than just that performance-which is a snapshot of what they learned.
Anonymous wrote:It wasn't historical. It was songs, pledge of allegiance. The boys who did the President spiel all had a Lincoln like hat on their heads, made of paper. The boys were of varying races and ethnicities. So historical accuracy doesn't seem to be the issue here.
This is K. No one mentioned it. It is just my observation.
Anonymous wrote:Even if they were, what if only the white boys were allow to play presidents? That's historically accurate as well.