Anonymous wrote:all these posts make it sound like there is a significant attrition rate for privates, is that the case?
Anonymous wrote:Let's take a certain percentile of HHI from the census data. Say we want to know what the 95th percentile HHI was in 2000 and 2012, and then compare the change in those HHI's versus the change in tuition.
2000 95th percentile HHI: $145k
2012 95th percentile HHI: $191k
So that's just about a 33% increase in HHI if you stay at the same percentile over those 12 years.
If, as PP said, in 2000 they were paying $12k for tuition in 2000 and were paying about $30k in 2012, that tuition increased by 150 percent during that time.
So, clearly, increases in tuition were WAY outpacing increases in HHI over the same period.
If you take incomes at the 75th percentile, it's:
2000 at 75th percentile: about 82k
2012 at 75th percentile: about 104k
So, at the 75th percentile of HHI, we are looking at about a 27% increase in HHI over those twelve years. Compared to a %150 increase in tuition at the same school.
No wonder we feel like families that used to be able to afford private can't anymore.
In the year 2000, if HHI was $120k and tuition was $12k, that person's HHI was in the
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is the same with colleges. I went to a good private college that had plenty of normal families that could pay with perhaps just a small student loan. It was not a huge stretch from a state U to the private school. Now the cost is 3x as much! Now a student loan does not make a dent in the price tag.
And here's a big piece of the problem: the families that have to scrape to afford $30k/year for private school are often putting off saving for the $60k/year colleges. My parents managed private school and also fully-funded our private college educations. For a middle class family, it's much harder today to manage both private school and private college.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely OP, this is my impression as well. No question, it changes the nature and the population of these schools. Now it's a "barbell" population, at best.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter they can make it as high as they want if there is dwmand to pay it.
Anonymous wrote:It is the same with colleges. I went to a good private college that had plenty of normal families that could pay with perhaps just a small student loan. It was not a huge stretch from a state U to the private school. Now the cost is 3x as much! Now a student loan does not make a dent in the price tag.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter they can make it as high as they want if there is dwmand to pay it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, I could have run the numbers like you did pp, thanks. But my bigger question is was there as much head scratching and asking ourselves why we are doing this.
I'm not the number-crunching PP, but her analysis does answer your question -- no, there wasn't as much angst about whether private school was worth it because tuition didn't take as big a bite out of family income.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, I could have run the numbers like you did pp, thanks. But my bigger question is was there as much head scratching and asking ourselves why we are doing this.
Anonymous wrote:It is the same with colleges. I went to a good private college that had plenty of normal families that could pay with perhaps just a small student loan. It was not a huge stretch from a state U to the private school. Now the cost is 3x as much! Now a student loan does not make a dent in the price tag.